Re: [Rails] Re: Optimizing ActiveSupport with native code

On Feb 7, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
>
> Steve Ross wrote:
>> On Feb 7, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Mat Brown wrote:
>>> So I'm looking for feedback from the group on that idea. Some
>>> But native implementations are probably only useful for methods that
>>> people as possible involved. But for now, I'd appreciate any feedback
>>> Looking forward to thoughts, comments, criticism, stinging insults,
>>> etc. if you've got 'em.
>>>
>>> Mat
>>
>>
>> This looks great, but have you considered the complexities of i8n on a
>> native implementation?
>
> How much does ActiveSupport have to do with I18N anyway? (OK, I'll
> admit it: I hate Rails' I18N, and I think it was a mistake. I use
> FastGettext for I18N, and I don't like how it can't be used for AR
> errors easily. The I18N-agnostic 2.2 was easier to deal with. It will
> be interesting to see how 3 handles this.)
>
> Best,

Well, lots. Look at Mat's prototype implementation and the ramifications will become immediately apparent.

--steve

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.