Re: Substituting your own java class instead of GWT-provided one

Ok, I just found the page that talks about it:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DeferredBindingsForJRE

I am not sure if this will work for the GWT compile process, but I'll
try.

I also not understanding this line in the document:
************************
Because the browser is not always known, you must specify a default
deferred binding that is suitable on all browsers. Add that deferred
binding to Emulation.gwt.xml. Here is what it looks like for
StringBuffer.....
************************

It this telling us to unwrap the gwt-user.jar, change
Emulation.gwt.xml and and rewrap it again???

Thanks,
Yaakov.

On Feb 24, 1:35 pm, Yaakov <yaakov.chai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I seem to remember seeing somewhere that it's possible to through
> gwt.xml to substitute your own class instead of the GWT-provided one.
> Could someone point me to a resource where it would explain how to do
> it, etc.
>
> The reason I am attempting this is because of this bug in GWT
> compiler:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4423
>
> I would really like to use generics in my Async interface and Andrew
> submitted a patch which doesn't look like will be making it into GWT
> release any time soon (judging by the status of the bug).
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Yaakov.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.