twitter: rec.crafts.metalworking - 26 new messages in 14 topics

rec.crafts.metalworking
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking?hl=en

rec.crafts.metalworking@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Blacksmithing content:Decorative ironwork on Isla Mujeres, Mexico
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/13403642fb482982?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 5:36 am
From: Larry Jaques

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:14:32 -0500, the infamous Wes
<clutch@lycos.com> scrawled the following:

>spaco <spaco@baldwin-telecom.net> wrote:
>
>>We spend some time in Mexico and I did a survey of decorative ironwork
>>on Isla Mujeres, the "Women's Island" which is a few miles off shore
>>from Cancun, Mexico. This page shows how widely the work varies, in
>>age, style, attention to detail, etc.
>>
>>http://www.spaco.org/Blacksmithing/Pictures/IslaMujeresIronWork/IslaMujeresIronWork.htm
>
>
>A number of those gates looked like they were designed for security and ventilation. The
>art part of it conceals one of the practical purposes.

I really liked Gate 15.

Gate 17 looked like something I'd see in Tijuana. ;)

--
We don't receive wisdom; we must discover it for ourselves
after a journey that no one can take for us or spare us.
-- Marcel Proust

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Douchebagger Right-Wing retards..
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/1e2a07d02c1cd3a5?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 5:49 am
From: "Burled Frau"

"Hawke" <davesmithers@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:hkr2qo$312$1@speranza.aioe.org...

> Gummer is the perfect example of what a conservative is.

Uh, idiot. he's a member of your party.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/d00573543954f95d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 5:50 am
From: Larry Jaques

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:03:25 -0500, the infamous Wes
<clutch@lycos.com> scrawled the following:

>"Ed Huntress" <huntres23@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Wes" <clutch@lycos.com> wrote in message
>>news:g11cn.266144$N07.229546@en-nntp-05.dc1.easynews.com...
>>> "Ed Huntress" <huntres23@optonline.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> They really should have stuck to civil union legislation. That would
>>>>> have
>>>>> likely made a
>>>>> lot more progress than trying to redefine marriage to a new definition.
>>>>
>>>>Yeah. Like Lyndon Johnson said in 1957: "These Negroes, they're getting
>>>>pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got
>>>>something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their
>>>>uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this, we've got to give
>>>>them
>>>>a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a
>>>>difference."
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm old enough to remember segregation. I read 'Black Like Me' in
>>> elementary school.
>>>
>>> In case you don't remember it.
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Like_Me
>>>
>>> I have a feeling you also read that book and it likely formed an opinion.
>>> I bet my
>>> opinion matches yours.
>>>
>>> Trying to say gay mariage is equivalent is absurd.
>>>
>>> Wes
>>
>>How is it different? That's a serious question.
>
>Did you read the book?
>>
>>And if you're going to tell us that it somehow damages the institution of
>>conventional marriage, I'd sure like to know how it does that.
>
>Hell Ed, maybe I should have been able to marry my dog back when he was still living. I
>was responsible for his health and welfare. We had a bond. We were very close. I wanted
>him with me for the rest of my life.
>
>Conventional marriage. That says a lot. You are advocating unconventional or a
>re-definition of marriage.
>
>When in the last 2000 years or so has man man or female female marriage been considered?
>normal?

Although I've never understood the need for a marriage license, I also
don't understand what all the fuss is about gay marriage. It's their
life. Let 'em alone. I can understand their need as far as hospital
visitations, etc. Of course, marriage is a religious thang, and I've
never been partial to that little bit of manipulation, either.

Let the masses marry goats for all I care.

--
We don't receive wisdom; we must discover it for ourselves
after a journey that no one can take for us or spare us.
-- Marcel Proust

==============================================================================
TOPIC: fa: ionized air anyone?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/7e864b4e0e6abcf3?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 5:52 am
From: doc

On Feb 7, 8:54 pm, Beryl <fo...@road.net> wrote:
> Bill Noble wrote:
> > Picked this unit up for a filter that was attached to it - perhaps some
> > of you folks need super clean ionized air?
> >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300394900716
>
> I had an Ionic Breeze air purifier. It killed my parakeets.

Ozone is known to be toxic. And I gather that birds do have more
sensitive lungs. Some info here: http://www.birdsnways.com/wisdom/ww23ev.htm
You can dig around for more.

I use this style of air purifier to get rid of foul :-) smells
mainly.
Does a great job. Just wouldn't want to have any living critters
in the room when the machine is pumping ozone.

DOC
Something about robots...
http://www.robot-one.com

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Rep. John Murtha, American Hero, voice for veterans, dies at 77
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/9448916e52058cac?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 5:51 am
From: "Burled Frau"

"Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:700bcccc-420a-4ae1-be7c-2d67ea569947@m31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> RIP John.
>
> America is better because of you.

Yep, the daisies should be growing nice and tall now thanks to you. Shit
makes the best fertilizer.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Cheater's Notes
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/575dd2a6a3913041?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 9 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 5:54 am
From: "lab~rat >:-)"

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:19:00 -0600, Lookout <mrLookout@yahoo.com>
puked:

>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:04:35 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_real@bogus.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>
>>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>
>>Ah, yes. Palin again. Just what is your fascination with her?
>>
>>Could it simply be that she is a good foil to take the heat of 0bama's
>>meltdown?
>
>Nah..she's just fucking hilarious!

Agree completely

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalin/ig/Sarah-Palin-Pictures/Palin-Hi-Mom-Hand-Note.0zq0.htm
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

== 2 of 9 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:06 am
From: Cliff

On 8 Feb 2010 07:15:01 -0600, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbrown@nowhere.com> wrote:

>
>"Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
>news:s7mvm59ig2tga227km7phfvgumcfasapcn@4ax.com...
>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>
>Six words, stupid. A good speaker uses notes, not like a certain jackass
>we know who can't give a speech without a TelePrompter. At least Palin
>doesn't need to lug one of those around everywhere she goes.

A written speach is one thing.
IIRC Even Lincoln had written down his Gettysburg Address.
Simple Q & A is quite another.

Or are you claiming it was a put-up fraud & she could not even
remember four lines?

Any bets on all those colleges she went to to learn
about basketball?
Kicked out for cheating ....

>
>> This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
>> http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-notes-on-her-hand/
>> She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved questions. And
>> there
>> are actually human beings walking around who think she should be
>> President.
>> Wow...E
>
>Liar, Obama is the one who demands pre-approved questions.

That was bushco. He even used plants. You lie like a winger.
--
Cliff

== 3 of 9 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:08 am
From: Cliff

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:06:01 -0500, "lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:29:27 -0500, Cliff
><Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> puked:
>
>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>
>Does anyone besides me find it absolutely fucking hilarious that the
>libs have hitched their wagons to this story?

Even Faux carried it IIRC.
And she IS funny.

>Talk about over the top hypocrisy. It's almost as funny as them
>continuing to support the global warming scientists long after the
>WMDs were never found...

HUH?

>You get what I'm saying.

Your tinfoil beanie slipped?
--
Cliff

== 4 of 9 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:09 am
From: Cliff

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:42:20 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <Paul@Hovnanian.com>
wrote:

>I guess we now know what an Alaskan Palm Pilot looks like.

LOL
--
Cliff

== 5 of 9 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:12 am
From: Cliff

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:04:35 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_real@bogus.net> wrote:

>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>
>Ah, yes. Palin again. Just what is your fascination with her?

She was too stupid not to show off her cheating ...

>Could it simply be that she is a good foil to take the heat of 0bama's
>meltdown?

Or are wingers all morons?

Pre-approved SIMPLE questions & she COLUD NOT even remember her lines.

Some Q&A press session.
--
Cliff

== 6 of 9 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:14 am
From: Cliff

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:26:20 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_real@bogus.net> wrote:

>Lookout <mrLookout@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:04:35 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_real@bogus.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>>
>>>Ah, yes. Palin again. Just what is your fascination with her?
>>>
>>>Could it simply be that she is a good foil to take the heat of 0bama's
>>>meltdown?
>>
>>Nah..she's just fucking hilarious!
>
>So are the Keystone Kops.

She could play ... except they had skills.

>Why doesn't Little Cliffy use them to
>divert us from the ObamaMess?

Spoken like the winger that you are.
--
Cliff

== 7 of 9 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:16 am
From: Cliff

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:54:19 -0500, "lab~rat >:-)" <chase@cheeze.net> wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:19:00 -0600, Lookout <mrLookout@yahoo.com>
>puked:
>
>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:04:35 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_real@bogus.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>>
>>>Ah, yes. Palin again. Just what is your fascination with her?
>>>
>>>Could it simply be that she is a good foil to take the heat of 0bama's
>>>meltdown?
>>
>>Nah..she's just fucking hilarious!
>
>Agree completely
>
>http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/sarahpalin/ig/Sarah-Palin-Pictures/Palin-Hi-Mom-Hand-Note.0zq0.htm

How stupid.
--
Cliff

== 8 of 9 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:17 am
From: Cliff

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:12:54 -0800, VFW <georgeswk@toast.net> wrote:

>In article <s7mvm59ig2tga227km7phfvgumcfasapcn@4ax.com>,
> Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>> [
>> This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
>> http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-notes-on-her-
>> hand/
>> She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved questions. And there
>> are actually human beings walking around who think she should be President.
>> Wow...E
>> ]
>
>Walking but dragging their knuckles.

Perhaps cold makes for stupid.
--
Cliff

== 9 of 9 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:48 am
From: No-bammer

Cliff wrote:
> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
> [
> This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
> http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-notes-on-her-hand/
> She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved questions. And there
> are actually human beings walking around who think she should be President.
> Wow...E
> ]

What notes. Looked like subjects to talk about without any help from a
teleprompter. Liberal are truly ignorant fools. Buckwheat has a lot more
than subjects wrote down on his teleprompter. Buckwheat could have had
any number of subjects wrote down on hand, paper etc. and he still
wouldn't have known what to say without his teleprompter.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Trijicon
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/8210cfe1feffd9c3?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 5:58 am
From: Cliff

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:51:29 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
<Then-Destroy-Everything@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:

>>>> Find those "WMDs" yet?
>
>Under Hillary Clinton's Rose Law Firm files.

IOW Wingers are lying still.
--
Cliff

==============================================================================
TOPIC: A new "constitutional right"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/8e77e80070fe5b42?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:05 am
From: "dcaster@krl.org"

On Feb 7, 10:47 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:

> Being born in the U.S.doesn't make one special but it does mean you
> automatically have legal rights that foreign born people do not. It's
> the advantage and privilege of being a citizen as opposed to a visitor
> or an interloper. Being a citizen of a country is something and has some
> value. Depending on the quality of the country. Being a citizen of the
> U.S. has a lot more value to it than being a Mexican citizen, in my
> opinion. In no country do non citizens enjoy the same rights and
> freedoms that native born citizens do. It's the way it is everywhere. Do
> you think you should have the same rights in a foreign country as the
> people who are natives do? You do know that you won't get that anywhere,
> right? It's a given that a natural born citizen of a country gets things
> foreigners don't. I see nothing unfair about that. Being a citizen is
> kind of special. Like being a human is kind of special as compared to
> only being an abstract creation like a corporation. But that's just one
> man's opinion. Others may vary.
>
> Hawke

My wife is not a US citizen. She has a green card so can stay and
work in the US even if she got a divorce.
The only rights she does not have is the right to vote and there is
some law about being able to inherit property as a spouse in the US
without any estate tax. And since there is no estate tax so far this
year, I think the only right she does not have is the right to vote.

Many countries have restrictions on owning property, but the US does
not. For example US citizens can not own property in Mexico within so
many miles of the coast. So Mexican citizens may have rights that are
better than US citizens. It just depends on if you have to work for a
living.
If you have a green card, you can work in the US.,

Dan

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:19 am
From: Cliff

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:18:52 -0600, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:

>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>news:nvqvm5h8u7ai52nj94b2njlm5gp2c8q4e0@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:50:25 -0600, "RD (The Sandman)"
>> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>>news:7patm5h3s64v55e9oac3rlsggui7qajru2@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:41:22 -0600, grey_ghost471-
>newsgroups@yahoo.com
>>>> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> OTOH Glen Beck was just moaning & crying that
>>>>>> not enough people have lost their homes & been tossed
>>>>>> out in the cold & that some people & firms still have
>>>>>> some credit.
>>>>>> Wait til they get sick & try to get a bit of heathcare.
>>>>>
>>>>>1) I thought you didn't watch Beck?
>>>>>2) I do, which show and at waht time did he say that.
>>>>>3) I didn't thnk so.
>>>>
>>>> You are a winger & hence must be lying.
>>>>
>>>>>They call him Cliff 'cuz he keeps falling off of one.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,584649,00.html
>>>> <Snicker>
>>>
>>>Where in that cite, specifically, did he make the statement you claim
>>>above?
>>
>> You cannot read?
>
>Apparently you can't. Where in that cite, specifically, did he make the
>statement you claim above. Just to refresh your memory, that claim,
>specifically, was, "OTOH Glen Beck was just moaning & crying that not
>enough people have lost their homes & been tossed out in the cold & that
>some people & firms still have
>some credit."

Get reading lessons.
--
Cliff

==============================================================================
TOPIC: OT- Product Of The YEAR! -Somebody Should Get A Nobel Prize For This-
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/5f763679111ec221?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:10 am
From: "Ed Huntress"

"Bitrex" <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:M4edncN7LelT3-zWnZ2dnUVZ_qNi4p2d@earthlink.com...
> Ed Huntress wrote:
>> "Fred Abse" <excretatauris@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2010.02.07.15.45.27.188608@invalid.invalid...
>>> On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 08:17:00 -0500, Ed Huntress wrote:
>>>
>>>> Terror for an American driver is a roundabout in Britain. As I approach
>>>> one, my palms begin to sweat. Then my head begins to ache. Traffic
>>>> diagrams appear in my head. I bite my lip...
>>> Brits love going round in circles ;-)
>>>
>>> I think Garces Circle in Bakersfield, CA qualifies as a roundabout. I've
>>> come across a couple just outside Grand Junction, CO, and one in Balboa,
>>> CA,
>>> too. At least the traffic goes around those the right way.
>>
>> We used to have lots of them in NJ. There still are a few. We call them
>> circles.
>>
>> They're difficult enough, sometimes, even if the traffic stays on the
>> right side of the road. The first time I encountered one in the UK, it
>> felt like being in a demolition derby.
>>
>
> There are a lot in Massachusetts - we call them "Rotaries". Including
> this one at the base of the Bourne Bridge onto Cape Cod:
> http://www.capecodlivecam.com/bourne.shtml

That one doesn't look too bad. Actually, we still have one like that not far
north of here. I think the smaller ones are nuttier. As I recall, you used
to have lots of small, tight ones in MA. We had them in NJ, too.

--
Ed Huntress

==============================================================================
TOPIC: O.T. Toyota accelerator pics and explanations
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/82fad38f9e6d93d6?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:10 am
From: Lewis Hartswick

Don Foreman wrote:
> My wife's Corolla has a neat safety feature. There's a footpedal on
> the floor to the left of the brake pedal. Depressing this pedal
> disconnects the engine from the drive train!

I wouldn't have a car without one of those. :-) Did have a few
without back in the 50's but not since.
...Lew...

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:12 am
From: Lewis Hartswick

Wes wrote:
> Don Foreman <dforeman@NOSPAMgoldengate.net> wrote:
>
>> What
>> the hell, today is my 68th birthday, I'm a certified oldfart.
>
> But you are young in spirit. That is what counts.
>
> Happy Birthday!
>
> Wes
Hell Don I thought you were my age. :-) born 1932
...lew...

==============================================================================
TOPIC: How many layers of oil paint
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/41f7ccd7ea60daf5?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:19 am
From: Ignoramus11495

Lathe is coming along. One pin in the apron (part of interlock
mechanism) was bent, but I was able to straighten it with the press.

I have started painting the lathe, for now it is just the apron. I
tried to be good about stripping the paint and degreasing.

http://igor.chudov.com/projects/Clausing-6913-Lathe/07-Painting/

I plan on using Valspar oil paint and anti-rust red primer, which
seems to be a decent, thick alkyd paint. I believe it to be oil
resistant, but if anyone thinks otherwise, I would like to know.

The question is how many layers of primer and paint is best. I was
planning on two layers of primer and two layers of paint. This means
that it takes four days to paint something, with one day per layer due
to drying time.

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:47 am
From: "Pete C."

Ignoramus11495 wrote:
>
> Lathe is coming along. One pin in the apron (part of interlock
> mechanism) was bent, but I was able to straighten it with the press.
>
> I have started painting the lathe, for now it is just the apron. I
> tried to be good about stripping the paint and degreasing.
>
> http://igor.chudov.com/projects/Clausing-6913-Lathe/07-Painting/
>
> I plan on using Valspar oil paint and anti-rust red primer, which
> seems to be a decent, thick alkyd paint. I believe it to be oil
> resistant, but if anyone thinks otherwise, I would like to know.
>
> The question is how many layers of primer and paint is best. I was
> planning on two layers of primer and two layers of paint. This means
> that it takes four days to paint something, with one day per layer due
> to drying time.
>
> i

If I were going to all that trouble, I'd be looking for a good 2 part
catalyzed epoxy paint.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Palin's War
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/30d3a7eb784f853b?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:23 am
From: Cliff

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:38:59 -0600, grey_ghost471-newsgroups@yahoo.com (Gray
Ghost) wrote:

>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>news:u4lvm5ted3951isij2bqqo6q86dbujkkjl@4ax.com:
>
>> http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=118150&sectionid=351020104
>> "Palin beating drums for war on Iran"
>> [
>> US conservative darling Sarah Palin says she thinks President Barack
>> Obama should declare war on Iran.
>>
>> The one-time Republican vice presidential candidate said in an interview
>> with Fox News that Obama should play the war card if he wants to get
>> re-elected in 2012.
>>
>> "Say he decided to declare war on Iran or decided really to come out and
>> do whatever he could to support Israel, which I would like him to do,"
>> she said on Sunday.
>>
>> The military attack "changes the dynamics in what we can assume is going
>> to happen between now and three years," Palin added.
>> ....
>> ]
>>
>> What a fluffhead.
>
>Sounds to me like she has bigger balls than you, Obama and the rest of the
>Democrat Party.

Start another multi-trillon dollar unjustified war and whine
about the deficit ..... can you smell SureShot & neocons?
--
Cliff

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Forming wire mesh cloth - how to compress a cylindrical shape?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/badf57fe2c4c4c03?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:32 am
From: "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"

"Royston Vasey" <royston@vasey.com> fired this volley in
news:U_SdnftGR-mexuzWnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:

So why not use something ready-made, like this?

http://www.mcmaster.com/#suction-strainers/=5qqxb3

Part # 44265K24

Poly large-particle suction screen.

LLoyd

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:34 am
From: "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"

"Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" <lloydspinsidemindspring.com> fired this volley in
news:Xns9D1A6111CA679lloydspmindspringcom@216.168.3.70:

> "Royston Vasey" <royston@vasey.com> fired this volley in
> news:U_SdnftGR-mexuzWnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au:
>
> So why not use something ready-made, like this?
>
> http://www.mcmaster.com/#suction-strainers/=5qqxb3
>
> Part # 44265K24
>
> Poly large-particle suction screen.
>
> LLoyd
>

Or, more like what you're making -- part # 98755K15

LLoyd

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Palin explains "the Palin plan"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/03ba54274b8ed4f6?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Feb 9 2010 6:29 am
From: Cliff

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:14:28 -0800, VFW <georgeswk@toast.net> wrote:

>In article <cictm5l0dq9ttm3rcnsb51u2imsa3fljnk@4ax.com>,
> Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>> http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201002060025
>> "Palin explains "the Palin plan""
>> "From Fox News' coverage of Sarah Palin's February 6 address to the National
>> Tea Party Convention:"
>>
>> See video ....
>>
>> [
>> Wow...so profoundly SIMPLE! <trying to keep from laughing>
>>
>> Next time someone starts up a new country they should keep you in mindas a
>> consultant, Sarah...I hear it's easy money.
>> ]
>
>anymore about her "hand-Job"?

That goes with teabaggers, right?
http://anchorage.craigslist.org/ads/1591742611.html

--
Cliff

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.crafts.metalworking"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.crafts.metalworking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

twitter

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

rec.crafts.metalworking - 26 new messages in 14 topics - digest

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

About Me

Previous Posts