[Rails] Re: Rails vs Grails
egervari wrote:
>> purely business grounds Rails is king. So your former bosses decision might
>> not be a reflection as to the technical merits of Grails.
>
> When it comes to performance, how is Rails? Like if I were to design a
> raw Spring/Hibernate app, which I'm not going to... but let's say I
> did. What is the comparative performance with something like that,
> even though it probably isn't a fair comparison.
Rails can perform quite well. Hulu and Ravelry are both known for being
high-traffic Rails sites with excellent performance.
>
> Also, how well to do the tests run? Imagine a system with a few
> thousand unit/integration tests. How long will it take to get all the
> tests to run?
It depends. On lots of things.
>
> Is it hard to build cron-like events in rails/ruby? Can I do that
> inside of my app where it's hosted? In the java world, we have quartz
> to do this (and probably some others).
I believe there's a gem for this, though I've never tried to do it.
>
> Also, is it a good idea to use rails 3.0 even if it's in beta if the
> app is not going to production for awhile?
I wouldn't quite yet, particularly if you're not familiar with Rails or
Ruby.
>
> Thanks!
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
marnen@marnen.org
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home