Thursday, November 18, 2010

[Rails] Re: connect Model not to Controller named as pluarize of model but to another Controller

sukury47 wrote in post #962465:
>
> ps. As i've practiced rails, i thought that
> Controller not named as pluarize of model is bad structure of app
> is it real? do you think so two?

Yes, it annoys me that there are so many examples for Rails like that.

In Rails, part of the beauty is the idea of convention over
configuration. Conform to the 90% case and life (and coding) is easy.

Yet so many "introductory" tutorials begin with a non-conforming case.

It wasn't until I really looked at ALL the code generated by a simple

rails generate scaffold person first_name:string last_name:string

that it all started to make real sense.

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


Real Estate