Re: New ManyToManyField Approach
On Nov 23, 2010, at 5:40 PM, shane@bogomip.com wrote:
> Without test data I'm not sure where the trade offs are with the
> following. However it should improve the ability to look up items
> that reference a certain set of keys as well as easily check to see if
> a set already exists. This should also help reduce the number of rows
> in a reference table.
It definitely does that. The downsides are:
1. Selects that are looking for a particular individual value ("all items that reference user 1") are going to be a sequential scan.
2. You might get collisions on the adler32 function in real life; I'm not familiar enough with that particular function.
If you are using PostgreSQL, you might look at using intarray or hstore fields instead; those have the same advantages you enumerate, but you can also index on them in ways that will speed up searches for individual values.
--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof@thebuild.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home