Re: django/python performance vs play/java

On 8 Lug, 14:44, Thomas Guettler <h...@tbz-pariv.de> wrote:
> On 06.07.2011 15:33, drakkan wrote:> On 6 Lug, 14:03, akaariai <akaar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jul 5, 10:54 pm, drakkan <drakkan1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > using pgpool I get a 2,5x performance improvement thanks! I'll try on
> > intel atom again to see if there I have more improvements
>
> Hi,
>
> I am interessted in the result. Please post them to the list.

test from my laptop

django+uwsgi+pgpool2:

Requests per second: 71.40 [#/sec] (mean)

Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 56
66% 64
75% 70
80% 73
90% 81
95% 86
98% 93
99% 98
100% 134 (longest request)

without pgpool2:

Requests per second: 35.87 [#/sec] (mean)

Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 107
66% 119
75% 128
80% 135
90% 154
95% 171
98% 196
99% 213
100% 306 (longest request)

play 1.2.2 default options and default template engine (no japid)

Requests per second: 186.12 [#/sec] (mean)

Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 20
66% 23
75% 26
80% 27
90% 32
95% 35
98% 42
99% 47
100% 68 (longest request)

the db is postgres 8.4

I have no time to try jinja2 now, I guess it should speed up django a
bit,

drakkan

>
>   Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Guettler,http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
> E-Mail: guettli (*) thomas-guettler + de

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.