Saturday, October 8, 2011

[Rails] Re: Inexpensive Rails Hosting for Small Business Client

On Oct 7, 10:33 am, Danaka Kahn <structuralartis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Martin Wawrusch <mar...@wawrusch.com> wrote:
> > No, it is 0. There website is confusing, they are aware of this and are
> > hopefully clarifying this,
>
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:39 AM, trans <transf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Oct 6, 5:18 pm, jason white <jasonwhite...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > depending on the level of traffic, i recommend heroku
>
> >> I've heard this recommendation before, but isn't the minimum cost of
> >> heroku $36/mo ?
>
> Yeah - they are $0 to get started, then you pay to increase
> bandwidth/throughput. I am not sure how it goes if you start getting a lot
> of volume in terms of how the cost of heroku compares to others, but for the
> sheer ease and slickness of easy deployments, creating multiple environments
> (such as staging vs production), automated backups available (at least for
> pg), and so much more, unless someone has a specific reason not to use them,
> heroku is amazing. I hope their model is the general wave of the future, at
> least for us who would rather create functionality than configure boxes.

Indeed. I fully agree about the great features.

So I might try it. In fact, come to think of it, I might try
contacting them directly and see what their take on my kind of
business case is.

Thanks!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


Real Estate