Friday, December 9, 2011

[Rails] Re: what do you think it's better for pagination?

It can be a problem... but I don't think so in this case. According to
their gemspec, they are comparable. Notice that except for dependency
on railties, which you are most likely including in your own project
anyway, the rest in Kaminari are for the development environment.

If ever I can't decide, I go with the one that has the better
documentation.

d.

On Dec 9, 2:11 pm, Peter Vandenabeele <pe...@vandenabeele.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:15 PM, IAmNan <dger...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If you didn't know this already, you can see an aggregate of how many
> > people are using one or the other and spot trends in the code
> > maintenance at ruby-toolbox.
>
> >https://www.ruby-toolbox.com/categories/pagination
>
> What struck me here is that Kaminari depends on a bunch of gems
>
> *https://www.ruby-toolbox.com/projects/kaminari
> *https://github.com/amatsuda/kaminari/blob/master/kaminari.gemspec
>
> while will_paginate depends on none.
>
> *https://www.ruby-toolbox.com/projects/will_paginate
> *https://github.com/mislav/will_paginate/blob/master/will_paginate.gem...
>
> Is that a relevant element in a comparison?
>
> Peter

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


Real Estate