Re: [Rails] Switch versions of Rails

On 4/12/11 02:49, "Phil Dobbin" <phildobbin@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/12/11 20:04, "Colin Law" <clanlaw@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> In addition I would seriously question the use of 2.3 versus 3.1. 2.3
>> is only receiving security fixes now I believe (not bug fixes) and it
>> is not trivial to update an app from 2.3 to 3. If the app is expected
>> to have a significant life then using 2.3 just because the server is
>> currently geared up for that is surely a questionable decision.
>
> I have mentioned to the party involved that getting the web hosting people to
> upgrade is a very good idea partly because I'm just cutting my teeth on rails
> & all the work I've done so far has been on v.3 & I also thought that the
> hosting company will get a memo from HQ saying all the servers are getting an
> upgrade & it'll leave me, as you said, upgrading a live site.
>
> I think I'll be more adamant with the client about this & explain as well as I
> can the circumstances to her. Unfortunately, she's not at all computer-minded
> shall we say...

Just as a follow-up to this thread, the web hosting company are telling me
in order to get rails v.3 I have to go down the dedicated server route.
Don't think the client is going to stand an extra £180 a month on the
bill...

Cheers,

Phil.

--
Nothing to see here... move along, move along

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.