Re: New way to run your Django projects

Il giorno 19/mar/2012, alle ore 15:46, Alexander ha scritto:

> Kurtis,
>
> There is nothing wrong with using uwsgi protocol instead of FastCGI
> but you still have to run uWSGI server and it doesn't fit "simply
> using nginx" description. And I wouldn't call it "out of the box"
> either if I'd have to rebuild Nginx instead of using one shipped with
> my Linux distro (Debian Squeeze has Nginx with uwsgi module in
> backports and uWSGI is only available in unstable branch).
>
> I didn't say gevent-fastcgi is best way to run WSGI application.
>

Yes, but when you release a software, be prepared to answer the most useless, provocative
and rageous questions :) Expecially if your project is pretty 'unique'.

You are lucky (for now), the questions you got are all 'gentle' :)

Your project is really funny, but you will need to fight with two factors:

few users/developers understand non-blocking/async programming (albeit a lot of them use, and blindly suggest, such technologies)

webservers support for multipexing fastcgi requests is practically non-existent or buggy, on which webserver you have tested your project ?

In addition to this, Django is not the kind of framework/platform you can - easily - adapt to non-blocking/async paradigm :(

--
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it
JID: roberto@jabber.unbit.it

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.