Re: [android-developers] Re: Singletons in Android .... Final solution?

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Streets Of Boston
<flyingdutchie@gmail.com> wrote:
> You are right that the enum has been initialized a second time.
> But the second time is a different process (26202 != 26607).
>
> In other words, the first process (26202) did not see this enum being
> initialized twice. The process was killed and the new process had its enum
> initialized instead.

Yup, everything appears working normally here.

Now, the OP (IIRC) claims to see static data members be wiped out for
the same process, which is why I asked the OP for a reproducible test
case for that.

--
Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)
http://commonsware.com | http://github.com/commonsguy
http://commonsware.com/blog | http://twitter.com/commonsguy

Android Training...At Your Office: http://commonsware.com/training

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en