Re: Scaling django installation

>
> That's aggregated load time, and not a single page loading time. The test
> comprised of navigating to multiple pages to generate more real life
> scenario.
>

How many pages?

>
> > 3. text/html , which is the output of django app, is taking 62.74 %
> > time.
>
> This number might not be bad actually, taking into consideration that I aim
> to reduce the number of http connections per page to something pretty low.
>

Number of connections/page will not bring down this figure.


> > What is the payload of your html page ?
>
> 5- 10 Kb (compressed) on avg depending upon page content
>

> Since you thought the aggregated load time to be of a single page, I guess
> your perspectives need to change accordingly. :)

Possibly but that would depend on number of pages in testing. e.g. if
the number of pages about 10+ it seems logical but if its 2-3 pages
then its still on high side.

Also the load time increases near linearly with number of users. Which
doesn't sounds logical e.g. at peak its almost 3 miunutes.

rgds
vivek



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.