Sunday, March 17, 2013

[Rails] Re: rubygems, rubygems-bundler and bundler

> You can use `bundle exec rake` to load bundler first and ensure
> that
> these problems don't happen, but it gets a bit annoying to have to type
> that extra preamble everytime. rubygems-bundler aims to make that
> unnecessary.
>
> Fred

Thank you so much, Fred, for your explanation.
I got clear on Rubygems and bundler.
But I am not still able to get the handle of rubygems-bundler and
rubygems-update.
I am using RVM and it normally activated Rake 0.9.2.2.
If my current gemset is dependent upon Rake 0.8.7, I still have to type
bundle exec rake ... to use rake 0.8.7 even if I have ruygems-bundler
1.0.0 gem.
It can be thought that rubygems-bundler is not working as expected in
the RVM environment?

Regards,
Christopher

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


Real Estate