[Rails] Re: Rails 4 "belongs_to: record" association doesn't work
It would be weird if there are some reserved words for association names... and they are not documented.
On Friday, July 19, 2013 4:15:14 PM UTC+2, Ruby-Forum.com User wrote:
Colin Law wrote in post #1116001:
> On 19 July 2013 14:59, David <pie...@workhub.com> wrote:
>> Yes exactly. It's specific to the word 'record'. It works when I change it
>> to :foo or :b (or anything else).
>>
>> Are there any reserved words for association names?
>
> It would appear that the answer to that question is yes.
Although that might have been unintentional. I don't know of any
"official" reserved word list for association names.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/0f83d777-343d-47b3-9dab-1bac391518b1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home