twitter: rec.crafts.metalworking - 25 new messages in 11 topics

rec.crafts.metalworking
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking?hl=en

rec.crafts.metalworking@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

==============================================================================
TOPIC: OT: Actual Craig's List Ad Was: Guns Save Lives -- Again!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/55aad5dba11805d9?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:01 am
From: krw

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:10:41 -0800 (PST), Too_Many_Tools
<too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Feb 13, 1:56 pm, Rich Grise on Google groups
><richardgr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 12, 1:25 pm, Rich Grise on Google groups
>>
>> <richardgr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > From: "Dudley Brown" <Dudley.Br...@nationalgunrights.org>
>>
>> > Congratulations to the unnamed hero of this story. You saved your
>> > friends' lives.
>>
>> More:
>>
>> AN ACTUAL CRAIG'S LIST PERSONALS AD
>>
>> To the Guy Who Tried to Mug Me in Downtown Savannah night before
>> last.
>>
>> Date: 2009-05-27, 1 :43 a.m. E.S.T.
>>
>> I was the guy wearing the black Burberry jacket that you demanded that
>> I hand over, shortly after you pulled the knife on me and my
>> girlfriend, threatening our lives. You also asked for my girlfriend's
>> purse and earrings. I can only hope that you somehow come across this
>> rather important message.
>>
>> First, I'd like to apologize for your embarrassment; I didn't expect
>> you to actually crap in your pants when I drew my pistol after you
>> took my jacket.. The evening was not that cold, and I was wearing the
>> jacket for a reason.. My girlfriend had just bought me that Kimber
>> Model 1911 .45 ACP pistol for my birthday, and we had picked up a
>> shoulder holster for it that very evening. Obviously you agree that it
>> is a very intimidating weapon when pointed at your head ... isn't it?!
>>
>> I know it probably wasn't fun walking back to wherever you'd come
>> from with that brown sludge in your pants. I'm sure it was even worse
>> walking bare-footed since I made you leave your shoes, cell phone, and
>> wallet with me. [That prevented you from calling or running to your
>> buddies to come help mug us again].
>>
>> After I called your mother or "Momma" as you had her listed in your
>> cell, I explained the entire episode of what you'd done. Then I went
>> and filled up my gas tank as well as those of four other people in the
>> gas station, -- on your credit card. The guy with the big motor home
>> took 150 gallons and was extremely grateful!
>>
>> I gave your shoes to a homeless guy outside Vinnie Van Go Go's, along
>> with all the cash in your wallet. [That made his day!]
>>
>> I then threw your wallet into the big pink "pimp mobile" that was
>> parked at the curb .... after I broke the windshield and side window
>> and keyed the entire driver's side of the car
>>
>> Later, I called a bunch of phone sex numbers from your cell phone. Ma
>> Bell just now shut down the line, although I only used the phone for a
>> little over a day now, so what 's going on with that? Earlier, I
>> managed to get in two threatening phone calls to the DA's office and
>> one to the FBI, while mentioning President Obama as my possible
>> target.
>>
>> The FBI guy seemed really intense and we had a nice long chat (I
>> guess while he traced your number etc.).
>>
>> ;In a way, perhaps I should apologize for not killing you ... but I
>> feel this type of retribution is a far more appropriate punishment for
>> your threatened crime. I wish you well as you try to sort through some
>> of these rather immediate pressing issues, and can only hope that you
>> have the opportunity to reflect upon, and perhaps reconsider, the
>> career path you've chosen to pursue in life.. Remember, next time you
>> might not be so lucky.Have a good day!
>>
>> Thoughtfully yours,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> ------------------------
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Rich
>
>LOL...it is a joke...a poor one.

Ask your mother about poor jokes, TooStupid.

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:30 am
From: "Burled Frau"

"Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e7fde036-9607-4036-adab-0c09dd629525@j27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 13, 1:56 pm, Rich Grise on Google groups
> <richardgr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 12, 1:25 pm, Rich Grise on Google groups
>>
>> <richardgr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > From: "Dudley Brown" <Dudley.Br...@nationalgunrights.org>
>>
>> > Congratulations to the unnamed hero of this story. You saved your
>> > friends' lives.
>>
>> More:
>>
>> AN ACTUAL CRAIG'S LIST PERSONALS AD
>>
>> To the Guy Who Tried to Mug Me in Downtown Savannah night before
>> last.
>>
>> Date: 2009-05-27, 1 :43 a.m. E.S.T.
>>
>> I was the guy wearing the black Burberry jacket that you demanded that
>> I hand over, shortly after you pulled the knife on me and my
>> girlfriend, threatening our lives. You also asked for my girlfriend's
>> purse and earrings. I can only hope that you somehow come across this
>> rather important message.
>>
>> First, I'd like to apologize for your embarrassment; I didn't expect
>> you to actually crap in your pants when I drew my pistol after you
>> took my jacket.. The evening was not that cold, and I was wearing the
>> jacket for a reason.. My girlfriend had just bought me that Kimber
>> Model 1911 .45 ACP pistol for my birthday, and we had picked up a
>> shoulder holster for it that very evening. Obviously you agree that it
>> is a very intimidating weapon when pointed at your head ... isn't it?!
>>
>> I know it probably wasn't fun walking back to wherever you'd come
>> from with that brown sludge in your pants. I'm sure it was even worse
>> walking bare-footed since I made you leave your shoes, cell phone, and
>> wallet with me. [That prevented you from calling or running to your
>> buddies to come help mug us again].
>>
>> After I called your mother or "Momma" as you had her listed in your
>> cell, I explained the entire episode of what you'd done. Then I went
>> and filled up my gas tank as well as those of four other people in the
>> gas station, -- on your credit card. The guy with the big motor home
>> took 150 gallons and was extremely grateful!
>>
>> I gave your shoes to a homeless guy outside Vinnie Van Go Go's, along
>> with all the cash in your wallet. [That made his day!]
>>
>> I then threw your wallet into the big pink "pimp mobile" that was
>> parked at the curb .... after I broke the windshield and side window
>> and keyed the entire driver's side of the car
>>
>> Later, I called a bunch of phone sex numbers from your cell phone. Ma
>> Bell just now shut down the line, although I only used the phone for a
>> little over a day now, so what 's going on with that? Earlier, I
>> managed to get in two threatening phone calls to the DA's office and
>> one to the FBI, while mentioning President Obama as my possible
>> target.
>>
>> The FBI guy seemed really intense and we had a nice long chat (I
>> guess while he traced your number etc.).
>>
>> ;In a way, perhaps I should apologize for not killing you ... but I
>> feel this type of retribution is a far more appropriate punishment for
>> your threatened crime. I wish you well as you try to sort through some
>> of these rather immediate pressing issues, and can only hope that you
>> have the opportunity to reflect upon, and perhaps reconsider, the
>> career path you've chosen to pursue in life.. Remember, next time you
>> might not be so lucky.Have a good day!
>>
>> Thoughtfully yours,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> ------------------------
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Rich
>
> LOL...it is a joke...a poor one.
>
> TMT

Your two mommies didn't think it was a joke when he was calling them on the
phone.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Obama Fiddles while our County Shivers
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/9ad033005f276c90?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:01 am
From: "Burled Frau"

"Hawke" <davesmithers@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:hl7v4a$vsh$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> of their own? Pull your pants up already 0bama. Mr. O'droopy-drawers!
>>>
>>> The teabaggers are Repubicans in drag.
>>>
>>
>> Then the dimocrats should be able to fund their own fixin's, since your
>> party of liars and thieves are in majority. Now pull out your wallet and
>> send it to the big Zero, he's waiting for it. While you're at it, run
>> down to your recruiters and pick up your portly sized uniform. 0bama
>> needs your service. Suit up and ship out.
>
>
> How come you can't admit the truth? You want the republicans back in
> charge just like they did for the last eight years before Obama took
> office. You can't stand it that they lost power and someone else is in
> charge. You want to go back and let the same people have control again who
> caused us to be just about destroyed. You have to be pretty stupid to want
> that but that is what you want. That is why you keep whining and bitching
> about the new administration all the time. You want the loser republicans
> back in charge. Just fess up and say so. But if you do you will find that
> you are pretty much on your own because only the most idiotic, foolish
> people haven't learned the republicans are completely dishonest, corrupt,
> and incompetent. But those are they boys you want running the country.
> That tells everyone how messed up in the head you are. Thanks for making
> it so clear us all.
>
> Hawke

I've never specified whom I would like in office. It's you libtards who
still thought they were running against Bush. To this day you seem unsure if
you beat him or not, even though he wasn't running. They could shave a dog's
ass and teach him to walk backwards and put him in the Whitehouse. Not only
would he be better looking, he would make a better President than the chimp
in there now.

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:24 am
From: "Burled Frau"

"Hawke" <davesmithers@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:hl7ugo$v2u$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>> On Feb 12, 9:10 pm, "Burled Frau" <acht...@jawol.jah> wrote:
>>> "Hawke" <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:hl4f8g$h1p$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Wes wrote:
>>>>> Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Bush/Cheney did one hell of a job on the country. You expect the
>>>>>> Democrats to fix everything they broke in one year?
>>>>> Learn to count. Congress changed hands over 3 years ago. A President
>>>>> can't do much unless Congress authorizes funding.
>>>>> Wes
>>>> You need to know a little more than just the basic numbers. George Bush
>>>> didn't issue a single veto in the first six years of his presidency,
>>>> which
>>>> is unheard of in the modern era. After that he issued a lot, not
>>>> coincidentally that was when he lost the republican majority in
>>>> congress.
>>>> He vetoed everything the Democratic congress voted to do. He also had
>>>> enough republicans to sustain his vetoes. That means even though the
>>>> majority in congress was Democratic because of the republicans
>>>> president
>>>> and congressional minority they majority was stymied. But that fact
>>>> doesn't change the other fact that the policies Bush implemented can't
>>>> be
>>>> fixed over night or even in one year. The fallout from bad policies can
>>>> take years or even decades to repair. Which is what is happening now.
>>>> Most
>>>> people know that too. I just saw a poll on TV minutes ago that fixed
>>>> blame
>>>> on our economic problems. Only 7% blame Obama but 31% blame Bush and
>>>> 23%
>>>> blame Wall Street. So most people do think Bush is to blame. This time
>>>> their right.
>>>> Hawke
>>> Poor little Hack, you need to know a little more than just the basic
>>> numbers. First he complains about no vetoes, and then he complains about
>>> a
>>> lot of vetoes. The fact is that the democrats write bad bills filled
>>> with
>>> earmarks, and need to get vetoed.
>>>
>>> And poor Hack really needs to learn how to count. It wasn't that he
>>> issued
>>> "a lot" of vetoes, it was only twelve. And he didn't veto everything, it
>>> just seems that way when you're a libtard flailing your limpy wrists.
>>>
>>> And of the twelve bills that he vetoed, the democrats were only
>>> "stymied" on
>>> half of them. But when you're a lib flailing your wrists about, I guess
>>> knowing how to count is unimportant compared to the need to scream about
>>> something in your shrill libtard shrill voices.
>>>
>>> What's more important, is that 0bama is a big zero loser who had a
>>> majority
>>> to work with, no obstacles at all, and couldn't get anything done. 0zero
>>> with 0zero accomplishments as President. Now that's a sad state of
>>> affairs.- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Hey Hawke....you got my stalker Burled Frau all worked up.
>>
>> I owe you. ;<)
>>
>> TMT
>
>
> It isn't hard. All you have to do is throw some facts at him which prove
> how inept and incompetent his republicans are and it throws him into a
> tizzy. That happens all the time to right wingers. They are so easily
> flustered. They are so emotional and ill informed that when you tell the
> truth to them it throws them for a loop. Just listen to him. He calls
> Obama a zero when Obama has been handed just about the biggest mess of a
> country any president ever got. But he defends the makers of the mess time
> after time. You have to have a screw loose to do that. When you point that
> out to the Frau he just goes to pieces like all the pantywaist republicans
> do when you make them face the facts. It's pretty funny to watch too.
>
> Hawke

I'll let you know if it's true when you start throwing some facts around.
Until then, I'm still waiting for your list of accomplishments of 0bama as
President, the big ZERO. I just realized why you couldn't list any before.
Let's start again, this time we'll number the first item as zero. Post your
list below ->

0.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Still all blank, huh? You're as big of a zero as the chimp is!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Ask Not for Whom the Bell Tolls
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/e28f01e35d28c845?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:01 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:49:02 -0600, Neolibertarian <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote:

>The day of the Populist-Bureaucrat is numbered.

Like the English language & a liberal education?
--
Cliff

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:02 am
From: Cliff

On 13 Feb 2010 11:06:01 -0600, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbrown@nowhere.com> wrote:

>
>"Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
>news:3qddn5l16kud217m59s0otf66b394end5g@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:16:00 -0800 (PST), Shall not be infringed
>> <hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Het, dummy, go to a meeting and find out.
>>
>> Have a list of all te Klan meeting places & times?
>> --
>> Cliff
>
>Sure, tune your TV to TeaParty TV and keep up to date.
>Have fun, knock yourself out.
>http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=video&video-id=3086

Is she not a little young to be a teabagger?
--
Cliff

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Health Insurers Post Record Profits
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/069065e1baa28a6d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:06 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:05:02 -0600, Lookout <mrLookout@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:42:00 -0500, Cliff
><Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>
>>http://abcnews.go.com/Health/HealthCare/health-insurers-post-record-profits/story?id=9818699
>>[
>>Health Insurers Post Record Profits
>>Insurance Firms Rake in Profits as They Cut Patients, Advocacy Group Says
>>]
>>[
>>In the midst of a deep economic recession, America's health insurance companies
>>increased their profits by 56 percent in 2009, a year that saw 2.7 million
>>people lose their private coverage.
>>
>>The nation's five largest for-profit insurers closed 2009 with a combined profit
>>of $12.2 billion, according to a report by the advocacy group Health Care for
>>American Now (HCAN).
>>....
>>The HCAN report attributed this year's profits largely to insurers' dropping
>>coverage of 2.7 million people, who then moved onto public insurance plans such
>>as Medicaid.
>>]
>
>And the conservatives think nothing is wrong.

Melanie Shouse died.
"Ms. Shouse requested that her body be cremated wearing her Obama T-shirt."
--
Cliff

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:34 am
From: "Burled Frau"

"Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
news:kk7gn55qlgfuke3vasdaf7h5tp76l529s0@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:05:02 -0600, Lookout <mrLookout@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:42:00 -0500, Cliff
>><Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>http://abcnews.go.com/Health/HealthCare/health-insurers-post-record-profits/story?id=9818699
>>>[
>>>Health Insurers Post Record Profits
>>>Insurance Firms Rake in Profits as They Cut Patients, Advocacy Group Says
>>>]
>>>[
>>>In the midst of a deep economic recession, America's health insurance
>>>companies
>>>increased their profits by 56 percent in 2009, a year that saw 2.7
>>>million
>>>people lose their private coverage.
>>>
>>>The nation's five largest for-profit insurers closed 2009 with a combined
>>>profit
>>>of $12.2 billion, according to a report by the advocacy group Health Care
>>>for
>>>American Now (HCAN).
>>>....
>>>The HCAN report attributed this year's profits largely to insurers'
>>>dropping
>>>coverage of 2.7 million people, who then moved onto public insurance
>>>plans such
>>>as Medicaid.
>>>]
>>
>>And the conservatives think nothing is wrong.
>
> Melanie Shouse died.
> "Ms. Shouse requested that her body be cremated wearing her Obama
> T-shirt."
> --
> Cliff
>

Cliff would prefer the alternative, where the insurance companies would not
be able to make any payouts because of of no profits.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Soldering small
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/7a9b651dc5c1e291?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:10 am
From: Wes

Don Foreman <dforeman@NOSPAMgoldengate.net> wrote:

>
>Today I putzed with making suitable drive electronics for my
>summertime bug-free yellow LED reading light mentioned here before:
>http://members.goldengate.net/dforeman/yellowlight/
>
>Being retired and somewhat incorrigable, today became more of a
>"wonder if I can" rather than goal-directed activity making any
>rational sense. I don't have to make sense. I'm retired!
>
>I have 150 pcs of LM358 opamp in the mini SO-8 package in my goodiebox
>so I wondered if I could solder leads to one.
>
>I did.
>http://members.goldengate.net/dforeman/yellow_lite_elex/
>
>The wire is #30AWG wire wrap wire, .010" dia. I gobbed some 5-minute
>epoxy on afterwards to add some robustness.
>
>Guess I'm still ahead of the DT's and Parkinson's. Knock on wood!

Don, you sure have a steady hand. Did you use a microscope to see those 0.050" spaced
pads?

If I tried that, I'd have two big solderballs.

Tell us your technique please.

Wes

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Palin's Unfavorability Ratings At All-Time High
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/444787d3bca9ddfe?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 10 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:08 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:39:44 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
<Then-Destroy-Everything@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:

>On 2/13/2010 7:56 AM, Cliff wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:54:34 -0600, No-bammer <no-bammer@fgi.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Cliff wrote:
>>>> http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/02/11/sarah-palin%E2%80%99s-unfavorability-ratings-at-all-time-high/
>>>> "Sarah Palin's Unfavorability Ratings At All-Time High"
>>>
>>> Who took the poll? Was it nbc, abc or cbs. I took a poll and it was the
>>> complete opposite.
>>
>> Which southern red-neck bar were you in?
>
>The negative poll was take amongst Harvard graduates that have been
>Marxist Professors....

I think you are lying again, as usual.
Provide valid link to such a "poll".

Find those "WMDs" yet?
--
Cliff

== 2 of 10 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:13 am
From: Gerald Abrahamson

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:20:03 -0800, tankfixer
<paul.carrier@gmail.com> wrote:

>In article <h12an5p6hrdjirucemjc2qbmfefbi94bsq@4ax.com>,
>Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>>
>> http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/02/11/sarah-palin%E2%80%99s-unfavorability-ratings-at-all-time-high/
>> "Sarah Palin?s Unfavorability Ratings At All-Time High"
>
>She really does scare you, doesn't she...

Tina Fay scares Conservitards....

== 3 of 10 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:11 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:39:05 -0600, Lookout <mrLookout@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:39:44 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
><Then-Destroy-Everything@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2/13/2010 7:56 AM, Cliff wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:54:34 -0600, No-bammer <no-bammer@fgi.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cliff wrote:
>>>>> http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/02/11/sarah-palin%E2%80%99s-unfavorability-ratings-at-all-time-high/
>>>>> "Sarah Palin�s Unfavorability Ratings At All-Time High"
>>>>
>>>> Who took the poll? Was it nbc, abc or cbs. I took a poll and it was the
>>>> complete opposite.
>>>
>>> Which southern red-neck bar were you in?
>>
>>The negative poll was take amongst Harvard graduates that have been
>>Marxist Professors....
>
>You're lying again. Why?

Probably Winger's Disease again.
I doubt they can help it. They HAVE to lie.

There is a parasite that mice get that makes them act stupid to
attract cats - the next stage in the parasite's life cycle. IIRC.
What eats wingers?
--
Cliff

== 4 of 10 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:18 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:15:21 -0600, Neolibertarian <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote:

>In article <bgbdn55bmh1lcgm3m8v4ga2rsj9dbojme9@4ax.com>,
> Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:49:47 -0600, Neolibertarian <cognac756@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <s58dn5ldqpjmfcfop7jsr1ooro6mk55nl4@4ax.com>,
>> > Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:48:36 -0600, Neolibertarian <cognac756@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >The country is split into polarized halves. A little over half of United
>> >> >States citizens
>> >>
>> >> Seem to have IQs not much (if any) above 100.
>> >> Fewer of them are impresed by Palin, rethugs & wingers.
>> >
>> >PPOR.
>> >
>> >I think you're just making that up.
>> >
>> >Of course.
>>
>> http://secularright.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/iq_curve.jpg
>> Oddly most rethugs are on the left.
>
>Oddly enough, this is a poll is completely irrelevant to the discussion.

That was not a poll.
It was a graph of the IQ curve.
You just fell off on the far, far left.
HTH

>
>Right, left; there doesn't seem to be a correlation to intelligence
>quotients.

Then why are wingers so stupid?

>However, there /does/ seem to be a right-left correlation between those
>who take their living from the Public Trough, and those who fill the
>Public Trough.

IOW The rethugs just lost some elections big time.
Both houses of congress & the WH.

After having both for 8 years & thus creating these disasters
with their venal stupidity.

>Guess which are likely to be on the right, and which are likely to be
>left.

I've noticed that a lot of people on welfare are wingers.
Lazy bums, some of them. Others just plain crazy.
--
Cliff

== 5 of 10 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:19 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:03:29 -0600, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:

>"§nühw¤£f" <snuhwolf@yahoo.com> wrote in
>news:Xns9D1E67A1C5F8Dsnuhwolfyahoocom@216.196.97.142:
>
>> Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> clouded the waters
>> of pure thought with
>> news:bgbdn55bmh1lcgm3m8v4ga2rsj9dbojme9@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:49:47 -0600, Neolibertarian
>>> <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <s58dn5ldqpjmfcfop7jsr1ooro6mk55nl4@4ax.com>,
>>>> Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:48:36 -0600, Neolibertarian
>>>>> <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >The country is split into polarized halves. A little over half
>>>>> >of United States citizens
>>>>>
>>>>> Seem to have IQs not much (if any) above 100.
>>>>> Fewer of them are impresed by Palin, rethugs & wingers.
>>>>
>>>>PPOR.
>>>>
>>>>I think you're just making that up.
>>>>
>>>>Of course.
>>>
>>> http://secularright.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/iq_c
>>> urve.jpg Oddly most rethugs are on the left.
>>
>> Just searching on "Palins favorability ratings" brings up this:
>> http://www.aolnews.com/the-grid/article/sarah-palin-hits-new-low-in-
>> poll/19354785
>>
>> Only 37% approval rating.
>>
>
>Then why are you guys so afraid of her? ;)

You are projecting again.
Is she better educated or smarter than you are?
--
Cliff

== 6 of 10 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:26 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:08:05 -0600, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:

>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in
>news:du3en5dihkopob0h8nulvg9akieq0jjf3s@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:03:29 -0600, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> got double secret
>> probation for writing:
>>
>>>"§nühw¤£f" <snuhwolf@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>news:Xns9D1E67A1C5F8Dsnuhwolfyahoocom@216.196.97.142:
>>>
>>>> Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> clouded the waters
>>>> of pure thought with
>>>> news:bgbdn55bmh1lcgm3m8v4ga2rsj9dbojme9@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:49:47 -0600, Neolibertarian
>>>>> <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <s58dn5ldqpjmfcfop7jsr1ooro6mk55nl4@4ax.com>,
>>>>>> Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:48:36 -0600, Neolibertarian
>>>>>>> <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >The country is split into polarized halves. A little over half
>>>>>>> >of United States citizens
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seem to have IQs not much (if any) above 100.
>>>>>>> Fewer of them are impresed by Palin, rethugs & wingers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>PPOR.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think you're just making that up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Of course.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://secularright.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/iq_c
>>>>> urve.jpg Oddly most rethugs are on the left.
>>>>
>>>> Just searching on "Palins favorability ratings" brings up this:
>>>> http://www.aolnews.com/the-grid/article/sarah-palin-hits-new-low-in-
>>>> poll/19354785
>>>>
>>>> Only 37% approval rating.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Then why are you guys so afraid of her? ;)
>>
>> Only those so desperate to defend her idiotic mouth breathing ever
>> make that claim. The rest just laugh at her and laugh at those who
>> support her for being taken in by one of the most hamfisted grifters
>> to have ever walked the polical stage.
>
>Actually, no, you guys keep bringing her up.....the conservatives don't.
>Many conservatives don't support her either. Ergo, if she were simply
>dropped as a subject, she would fade from the public scene in a few short
>weeks. However, you guys don't want that to happen, do you.

"Americans would elect a ham sandwich for president if it would promise them
jobs and a higher income." --Ron Bonjean, GOP strategist

Ham Sandwich + Pet Rock in 2018

>> The "populist" required a $100,000 speaking fee before she would
>> address her adoring morons. They believed she was going to "donate
>> it".
>
>Perhaps she did, perhaps she didn't. In any case, it was her money to do
>with as she pleased. Those that contributed to that fee may or may not
>have gotten their money's worth, but that is up to them to decide.....not
>you.

So you say she lied again & it's okay?
Because she's a winger & you expect endless lies?

>> Classic wingnut: Inability to differentiate laughing at them from
>> laughing with them.
>
>Why describe yourself like that? No self esteem?

"You are confused." - Tom Downey
(Of the famed Tom Downey School of Diplomacy)
--
Cliff

== 7 of 10 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:28 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:26:02 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:

>>Actually, no, you guys keep bringing her up.....the conservatives don't.
>
>So, bringing up her hilarious and entertaining antics is fear?

She does not seem to have any plan or concepts or grasp of reality at all.
Nothing to discuss or debate.

But she can see the moon from her broom so she's a Space Cadet!
--
Cliff

== 8 of 10 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:30 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:20:03 -0800, tankfixer <paul.carrier@gmail.com> wrote:

She's got GREAT ratings !!
--
Cliff

== 9 of 10 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:36 am
From: "§nühw¤£f"

Lookout <mrLookout@yahoo.com> clouded the waters of pure thought
with news:7haen5pcvl2l8anlnnfjdho3kh58klh3ba@4ax.com:

> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:03:29 -0600, "RD (The Sandman)"
> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>"§nühw¤£f" <snuhwolf@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>news:Xns9D1E67A1C5F8Dsnuhwolfyahoocom@216.196.97.142:
>>
>>> Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> clouded the
>>> waters of pure thought with
>>> news:bgbdn55bmh1lcgm3m8v4ga2rsj9dbojme9@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:49:47 -0600, Neolibertarian
>>>> <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <s58dn5ldqpjmfcfop7jsr1ooro6mk55nl4@4ax.com>,
>>>>> Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:48:36 -0600, Neolibertarian
>>>>>> <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >The country is split into polarized halves. A little over
>>>>>> >half of United States citizens
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seem to have IQs not much (if any) above 100.
>>>>>> Fewer of them are impresed by Palin, rethugs & wingers.
>>>>>
>>>>>PPOR.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think you're just making that up.
>>>>>
>>>>>Of course.
>>>>
>>>> http://secularright.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/i
>>>> q_c urve.jpg Oddly most rethugs are on the left.
>>>
>>> Just searching on "Palins favorability ratings" brings up this:
>>> http://www.aolnews.com/the-grid/article/sarah-palin-hits-new-low-
>>> in- poll/19354785
>>>
>>> Only 37% approval rating.
>>>
>>
>>Then why are you guys so afraid of her? ;)
>
> Stupid conclusion.

Not quite. Bush was a failure in every sense of the word, yet got
appointed to the office of pResident.
Palin is stupid and charming, like a female version of Chimpy. Chimpy
played "decider" (note his need to make the claim, loudly) but it was
obvious that Cheney was pulling the strings all along. If Caribou
Barbie finds a ruthless & cunning running mate to whisper answers in
her ear...we get what we got with BushCo all over again.

--
http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

== 10 of 10 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:39 am
From: "§nühw¤£f"

Lookout <mrLookout@yahoo.com> clouded the waters of pure thought
with news:pojfn59jgusm7tncakjbo5mt9jji20bffc@4ax.com:

> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:57:15 -0800, "John R. Carroll"
> <jcarroll@ubu,machiningsolution.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"§nühw¤£f" <snuhwolf@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:Xns9D1E67A1C5F8Dsnuhwolfyahoocom@216.196.97.142...
>>> Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> clouded the
>>> waters of pure thought with
>>> news:bgbdn55bmh1lcgm3m8v4ga2rsj9dbojme9@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:49:47 -0600, Neolibertarian
>>>> <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <s58dn5ldqpjmfcfop7jsr1ooro6mk55nl4@4ax.com>,
>>>>> Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:48:36 -0600, Neolibertarian
>>>>>> <cognac756@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >The country is split into polarized halves. A little over
>>>>>> >half of United States citizens
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seem to have IQs not much (if any) above 100.
>>>>>> Fewer of them are impresed by Palin, rethugs & wingers.
>>>>>
>>>>>PPOR.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think you're just making that up.
>>>>>
>>>>>Of course.
>>>>
>>>> http://secularright.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/i
>>>> q_c urve.jpg Oddly most rethugs are on the left.
>>>
>>> Just searching on "Palins favorability ratings" brings up this:
>>> http://www.aolnews.com/the-grid/article/sarah-palin-hits-new-low-
>>> in- poll/19354785
>>>
>>> Only 37% approval rating.
>>>
>>At least Palin's in good company
>>
>>Former Alaska governor isn't only politician Americans have judged
>>unqualified for the presidency
>>Emily Holleman
>>
>>Feb. 12, 2010 |
>>
>>According to a recent ABC News/Washington Post poll, the
>>percentage of Americans who view Sarah Palin as "unqualified to be
>>president" has skyrocketed.
>>
>>
>>
>>At the same time, the former Alaska governor's recent antics,
>>including a speech at the Tea Party Convention, have been
>>generating more buzz about a possible presidential run in 2012. To
>>put Palin's prospects in perspective, here's how she stacks up
>>against other White House hopefuls in terms of the percentage of
>>Americans who judged them unqualified for the Oval Office.
>>
>>
>>
>> a.. Sarah Palin (February 2010): 71 percent
>> b.. Ross Perot (May 1994): 64 percent
>> c.. Dan Quayle (May 1994): 62 percent
>> d.. Jesse Jackson (June 1987): 46 percent
>> e.. Pat Robertson (June 1987): 43 percent
>>
>>
>>(All numbers are taken from ABC News/Washington Post polls).
>>
>>
>>
>>Obviously, none of those other candidates ran really serious
>>races.
>
> NONE were serious at all. Not even close.
>
Ross Perot threw a shitload of money away on "not being serious"
then.

HE WAS ENTERTAINING! A LITTLE DYNAMO!

^_^

>
> But one
>>who did had similar trouble, with numbers about as bad as
>>Jackson's and Robertson's, though not Palin's. A June 2003 CNN/USA
>>Today/Gallup poll showed that 44 percent of Americans thought
>>then-Sen. Hillary Clinton wasn't qualified to be president.
>>
>>http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2010/02/12/palin_unqualified
>>/print.html
>>
>>JC
>>
>

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Pictures of sorted metals
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/da705c6c8f6bed6c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:14 am
From: Ignoramus16496

On 2010-02-14, Karl Townsend <karl_townsend.NOT@embarqmail.com> wrote:
>
> "Ignoramus5865" <ignoramus5865@NOSPAM.5865.invalid> wrote in message
> news:DsednU2-07U5EOrWnZ2dnUVZ_rNi4p2d@giganews.com...
>> They are somewhat annotated.
>>
>> http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/Metals/
>
> Looks like a nice pile for your hobby.
>
> Ten years ago, I was at an auction. When they got to the metal room, they
> started on one box of cold rolled and nobody bid. So the auctioneer said,
> how much for the whole lot? I was right in front and said $100. One other
> guy bid 110 then I went $120. And it was done. The rest of the group got
> PISSED thinking we were bidding on the cold rolled. I had just bought over
> 10,000 pounds of various tool steels. Took two trips with my one ton truck.
> I sold the H13 off for $1000 and one piece of P20 for $500 (mold plate)

Awesome. YOU SUCK!!!!

> Bet the auctioneer learned that all metal isn't just scrap metal.

I bet he does not care.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Dear Sarah Palin
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/49995c2bf299dcdf?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:35 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:45:33 -0800, tankfixer <paul.carrier@gmail.com> wrote:

>In article <4j6dn55v4g8druvm6r90fm3avhhmjj22og@4ax.com>,
>Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:44:38 +0545, Kadaitcha Man <anon@no.email> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Forged post alert !!
>>
>> > [quoted text muted]
>> >[snip]
>> >
>> >Humour isn't your strong point, hey. So much so that you have to steal it
>> >and post it, uncredited, to usenet.
>>
>> Uncensored?
>> Posted what I got. Tough luck.
>
>Comprehension isn't your strong suit is it Cliff.
>
>He said "uncredited"....not "uncensored"
>

Don't let the draft from your ears blow your pointy foil hat off.
http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscartoons/cartoonists/bro/lowres/bron1054l.jpg
--
Cliff

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Trijicon
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/8210cfe1feffd9c3?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:36 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:52:18 -0800, tankfixer <paul.carrier@gmail.com> wrote:

>> You claim they are lying.
>> Where are the false advertising complaints & suits?
>
>If it bothers you go ahead and file a suit..
>I just don't do business with companies that stretch the truth when they
>advertize.
>

But you claim the US military does, right?
Is this about bible & superstition verses again?
--
Cliff

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Cheater's Notes
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/575dd2a6a3913041?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:37 am
From: Cliff

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:09:46 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_real@bogus.net> wrote:

>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>> Since bushco the rate of economic growth in the US is up 12%.
>> That's a one-year all-time record IIRC.
>
>Wouldn't care to post something to support that little claim, would
>you?

Look it up.
--
Cliff

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:38 am
From: Cliff

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:01:30 -0600, Lookout <mrLookout@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:09:46 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_real@bogus.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>
>>> Since bushco the rate of economic growth in the US is up 12%.
>>> That's a one-year all-time record IIRC.
>>
>>Wouldn't care to post something to support that little claim, would
>>you?
>
>You don't read the papers, do you?

He's probably too busy with Faux & Rush <G>.
--
Cliff

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Dowel pin replacement
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/d13418d67d99a7aa?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Feb 14 2010 8:45 am
From: "Karl Townsend"

> I sent a package to "J", I have millions more if they work well. I
> figured out that with a full pot that the lead stream pressure would
> overwhelm the cavities and not fill out as well and the valve adjustment
> is too coarse. With the pot less than half full, it works great.

Thanks. I just talked to "the kid" this morning. he's up past his tail in
snow and his diesel truck just became a steam engine. NOT good. It may be a
few days before they get a trial.

Karl

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.crafts.metalworking"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.crafts.metalworking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

twitter

Sunday, February 14, 2010

rec.crafts.metalworking - 25 new messages in 11 topics - digest

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

About Me

Previous Posts