Sunday, May 16, 2010

[Rails] Re: Integrate new fields in a table with CRUD functionality:

Hi Colin,

> I think Toyota may be an better comparison.

Good point.

BTW, I started to employ unit-tests. You and Marnen have beaten me
into submission :-)

Sincere best wishes,
Richard


On May 16, 3:29 am, Colin Law <clan...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 16 May 2010 01:59, RichardOnRails
>
> <RichardDummyMailbox58...@uscomputergurus.com> wrote:
> > ...
> >> do you really want to work for clients who don't
> >> understand the importance of doing it right?
>
> > Absolutely!  First of all they paid me well. And if you've got kids to
> > feed or a mortgagee to repay, that's important. Secondly,  clients
> > asked me to produce or modify code quickly, and they have a right to
> > buy Volkswagen code rather than Cadillac code, as do buyers for
> > cars.
>
> I think Volkswagen is a poor analogy.  They may be basic cars but have
> a reputation for high reliability.  I think Toyota may be an better
> comparison.
>
> Colin
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


Real Estate