[Rails] Re: Re: Postgres, concurrency, and rails

Zach Brod wrote:
> It must be the ancient version of Rails we are using then. The
> postgresql_adapter requires a gem (whatever version, postgres-pr,
> ruby-postgres, etc) that calls itself 'postgres', and I imagine pg only
> responds to 'pg'. Perhaps Rails 3.0 requires either postgres OR pg. It
> might be possible I could modify the adapter but that is probably asking
> for trouble.

I remember the pain in finding the correct postgresql ruby gem. Indeed
the latest gem is called "pg", however I can't remember it was
compatible at the time of Rails 1.2 but I guess so. Maybe use an older
"pg" gem as Rails has been modified a lot since and so was pg.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.