Compiled GWT JS size > handwritten JS size?

Let's take a common non very interactive page, like a common
"Wikipedia" page. For such pages, where there is not a lot of
javascript: Compiled GWT JS size > handwritten JS size and it's more
optimal(performance overhead) to use simple JavaScript than GWT

On the other hand, if web-page is very interactive, like Gmail, then :
Compiled GWT JS size < handwritten JS size due to GWT's optimizations.
In such cases it's more optimal(performance overhead) to use GWT than
JavaScript.

In general, It would be a mistake to use GWT for Wikipedia due to
performance overhead. Am i right?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.