Saturday, February 4, 2012

Re: [android-developers] Re: Audio Latency big problem on some devices

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:43 AM, RLScott <fixthatpiano@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thanks for that link!  It says there in section 6.3 that:
>
> Using the above definitions, device implementations SHOULD exhibit
> each of these properties:
> • cold output latency of 100 milliseconds or less
> • warm output latency of 10 milliseconds or less
> • continuous output latency of 45 milliseconds or less
> • cold input latency of 100 milliseconds or less
> • continuous input latency of 50 milliseconds or less
>
> which would be fine for me (continuous input latency).  So I guess my
> no-name Chinese tablet is non-conforming, having a latency of around
> 360 msec.!

Well...

The use of SHOULD in specs like this is fairly literal. If the device
must support those latencies, the spec would have used MUST. Now, I
don't know if Google will fail a device that whiffs on too many
SHOULDs or not.

--
Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)
http://commonsware.com | http://github.com/commonsguy
http://commonsware.com/blog | http://twitter.com/commonsguy

Android Training in NYC: http://marakana.com/training/android/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


Real Estate