Thursday, May 24, 2012

Re: JSON Parsing in GWT Client

Don't get me wrong. One of my developers was evaluating JSON frameworks. He really liked pirity due to the fact that you can annotate fields there and not setters and getters like in AutoBean. He fealt that it's just too much code. I know this discussion is academic, but that's how he feels.

I'm also not sure whether you can plug in custom code formatters in AutoBeans as easily as in piriti.

So if it wasn't for performance we'd use piriti. Especially because it's so easy to switch to XML.

The reason why performance is so important for us is because our apps are on mobile. This parsing time can easily make the app seem unresponsive to the user. 

If we were writing for desktop browsers, we probably wouldn't care so much about each millisecond of parsing.

I guess what I wanted to say is that you've done a really good job with piriti. I know it's hard to fight with a group of hired google developers.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/OHOX2x8ofFMJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


Real Estate