Re: ListEditor.class - put a try {} catch {} around the flush() { list.flush() }

Awesome! Thanks :)

Have a good day,
Brandon Donnelson

+Follow Me

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:13:48 PM UTC+2, Brandon Donnelson wrote:

If Null is As Designed for the ListEditor, I suggest using an assertion to tell the user. I don't mind sending the List Editor an empty list, its when I forget to do code for that, that I try finding it.  I appreciate the info about the other options. Thanks for looking at this too. 

I'll have to setup breakpoints on exceptions. Thanks for the tip.

FYI, fix proposed and discussed here (as part of another fix): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1664803/ 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/AkMQHSRVgzEJ.

To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.