rec.crafts.metalworking - 26 new messages in 10 topics - digest

rec.crafts.metalworking
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking?hl=en

rec.crafts.metalworking@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Taking over Fannie & Freddie was part of the Democrats clean up operation
for their own mess - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/27850e46baa11657?hl=en
* Interesting request - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/1a4743bf87f29236?hl=en
* This New York Times Editorial Gets It Right - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/9f1a3e9bbef3181e?hl=en
* ART LOWE, Spammer ------------------------------- Re: Evidence That
Americans Are Psychotics While Canadians Aren't. - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/5b86442ddc2cd877?hl=en
* ART LOWE, Spammer ------------------------------- Re: News Item! Another
American Gun Owner Stopped Dead In His Tracks Before He Does More Harm! - 1
messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/661fc69b20652718?hl=en
* ART LOWE, Spammer ------------------------------- Re: Americans are Dumb Fat
Asses Whose Banking System Almost Died Under Bush - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/8aebf6fb3374a24c?hl=en
* Having Butt Sex With Your Boy Is What Democrats Do! - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/ef1231fe17476a4c?hl=en
* Famous presidential lies - 12 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/3cb2a4cd7e7b85f8?hl=en
* Ping Richard! - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/1b38c3b536a8c4aa?hl=en
* The Fact Is, The Rich Don't Have Enough Money - 2 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/1b1dc40682737d00?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Taking over Fannie & Freddie was part of the Democrats clean up
operation for their own mess
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/27850e46baa11657?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 12:43 pm
From: BeamMeUpScotty


On 1/18/2014 2:52 PM, Michael Bachmann wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:26:52 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty
> <ThenDestroyEveryThing@Blackhole.nebulx.com> wrote:
>
>> The Obama administration's decision to cover an unlimited amount of
>> losses at the mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over
>> the next three years stirred controversy over the holiday.
>
> So what? The United States has had a mixed economy for the last 80+ years.
> We have many programs and tax dollars used to support capitalists
> businesses to help the economy grow. Letting Fannie & Freddie fail is not
> in our best interest.
>
> The bail out of corporations began under President Bush and President
> Obama continued it. The bail out has helped stabilized the US economy and
> kept the rate of employment stable.

"What difference does it make now"


OK Hillary Jr.



The problem is that deciding how much Socialism is OK... is like
deciding how much dog shit in your bowl of ice cream is alright.


You might like more even more dog shit in your ice cream, personally I
don't want any.















== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:31 pm
From: Gunner Asch


On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:52:51 -0800, Michael Bachmann
<michael.bachmann1978@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>The bail out of corporations began under President Bush and President
>Obama continued it. The bail out has helped stabilized the US economy and
>kept the rate of employment stable.
>

Stable? ROFLMAO!!!!!! We are going into another deeping depression
and the stockmarket is about to implode in the next 4 months

Unemployment still is over 22% and its not getting any lower despite
the attempts of the Democrat controlled MSM to say..say it is.

Gunner

__
"Anyone who thinks Obama is doing a good job
is either stupid or a perpetual societal leech"

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com






==============================================================================
TOPIC: Interesting request
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/1a4743bf87f29236?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 1:01 pm
From: Gunner Asch


On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:07:03 -0700, "Bob La Londe" <none@none.com99>
wrote:

>"pyotr filipivich" <phamp@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>news:uk2cd9lecrmpnlpsap05gq4ggr6enq8chm@4ax.com...
>> Gunner Asch <gunnerasch@gmail.com> on Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:32:13 -0800
>> typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:
>>>On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:46:19 -0600, Ignoramus10472
>>><ignoramus10472@NOSPAM.10472.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 2014-01-14, Gunner Asch <gunnerasch@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Got this request a few moments ago
>>>>>
>>>>> "I found your name and email on a CNC forum about repairing Monarch
>>>>> lathes. I have a 1944 Monarch 12?ck (I think) and am in need of the a
>>>>> Headstock Spindle Speed Change Lever. Would you have one of these or
>>>>> know where I could find one?"
>>>>>
>>>>> Any ideas of where to find one for the gentleman?
>>>>
>>>>As most of these lathes, still found, are good for scrap only, I
>>>>would keep watching ebay. I scrapped a lathe like that once and sold a
>>>>lot of parts that typically break when these lathes are mishandled.
>>>>
>>>>i
>>>
>>>If you run across one...or that part...let me know. Its from a guy at
>>>a college machine shop trying to keep a machine going.
>>
>> Might have to turn it into a "Multi Discipline Project" - design a
>> mold, cast it, machine to fit.
>
>Hmmm... I was just thinking before I read your reply, that making a new
>handle might be a good class/shop project.
>
Indeed it would.

I mentioned in our conversation that it could be simply made out of
bits and pieces welded together. It would not match cosmetically..but
a spline is a spline etc. He agreed

Gunner

>
>---
>This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
>http://www.avast.com

__
"Anyone who thinks Obama is doing a good job
is either stupid or a perpetual societal leech"

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com






==============================================================================
TOPIC: This New York Times Editorial Gets It Right
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/9f1a3e9bbef3181e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 1:43 pm
From: jon_banquer


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/opinion/the-president-on-mass-surveillance.html?ref=opinion&_r=0





==============================================================================
TOPIC: ART LOWE, Spammer ------------------------------- Re: Evidence That
Americans Are Psychotics While Canadians Aren't.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/5b86442ddc2cd877?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 1:43 pm
From: §ρamßuster <�pam�uster@n�yet.ca>


On 1/18/2014 6:12 AM, The Metal Worker wrote:

Path: not-for-mail
From: The Metal Worker <metalwork@yahoo.ch>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.democrats,talk.politics.guns,can.politics,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.bicycles.tech,misc.survivalism,tx.guns
Subject: Re: Evidence That Americans Are Psychotics While Canadians Aren't.
Followup-To: rec.crafts.metalworking
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 09:12:51 -0500
Organization: ..
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <lbe24h$cr4$1@news.albasani.net>
References: <lbchu8$hsn$1@news.albasani.net>
Reply-To: yeung@yahoo.ch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.albasani.net
sUOzM/Lnz4g3N3mXPsHkddtmluhxIZZyFB8Vzsx28ZYb6WOd9WqN+9lnBm6/VzZdO9H7W+1CqHl0IhKNtvvtxCpvNbJfo4juE3hZjRTUyzyR50uKd0y58zcQt0vMxUoQ
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:12:34 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.albasani.net;
logging-data="eASPtcPbcPmp1d+sWKLrkmHPLx5gPXSoVGSwbQNlzDdAu8Vm7w24/S8SV5OFwLAGLF1QGvDTd16Ce7KlneBm8JoJUn12KLMYiOKjJb7Sdst20ul1GpbitTR3IZ9REv9V";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.03.00-gb
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UCi6TDZfzaHOKO82EgdFVAsybmg=
X-ICQ: 543516788
X-Received-Bytes: 2438
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3773329003
Xref: e alt.politics.democrats:1850223 talk.politics.guns:1829748
can.politics:1505015 rec.crafts.metalworking:1018386
rec.bicycles.tech:562736 misc.survivalism:1142264 tx.guns:284175

========================================================================================

I KNOW I'M A STUPID SPAMMER . . . . AND THIS TOPIC HAS NOTHING
TO DO WITH CANADIAN POLITICS

========================================================================================






==============================================================================
TOPIC: ART LOWE, Spammer ------------------------------- Re: News Item!
Another American Gun Owner Stopped Dead In His Tracks Before He Does More Harm!

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/661fc69b20652718?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 1:44 pm
From: §ρamßuster <�pam�uster@n�yet.ca>


On 1/18/2014 5:33 AM, Bomber Harris wrote:

========================================================================================

I KNOW I'M A STUPID SPAMMER . . . . AND THIS TOPIC HAS NOTHING
TO DO WITH CANADIAN POLITICS

========================================================================================

Path: not-for-mail
From: Bomber Harris <yeung@yahoo.ch>
Newsgroups:
alt.religion.christian,alt.california,aus.politics,alt.politics.democrats,talk.politics.guns,can.politics,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.bicycles.tech,misc.survivalism,tx.guns
Subject: News Item! Another American Gun Owner Stopped Dead In His
Tracks Before He Does More Harm!
Followup-To: alt.religion.christian
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:33:52 -0500
Organization: ..
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <lbdvr8$88e$1@news.albasani.net>
Reply-To: yeung@yahoo.ch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.albasani.net
ymwX9RoKQMYnCvkEZU4mjo0P49vU85hmzxSV8tFyKYIMs6geLWrgJW86gfBwSAmsBqcS/WwZ18mVkJTcwY7QfcDJO4LxMQEQeFmVKFKp+NCuCdillI9Mdn4q+WB/px8k
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:33:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.albasani.net;
logging-data="xibctg7gIrREKyYyGLTbO4ssOurnOp3GUfBpXP+yNztpN9WyFSrFA0YCkssjsLuwlhBZJTmeUedW2ZX4GpqaUAdYIu/k+GZfTCmOlAP82dr/ufphgp/rpnHIqPzG0WLl";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.03.00-gb
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CVCWwKUIvpnmmBSkId7ZSngIxyE=
X-ICQ: 543516788
X-Received-Bytes: 2304
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1482865578
Xref: e alt.religion.christian:1351716 alt.california:927878
aus.politics:1774901 alt.politics.democrats:1850218
talk.politics.guns:1829743 can.politics:1505012
rec.crafts.metalworking:1018383 rec.bicycles.tech:562734
misc.survivalism:1142260 tx.guns:284173





==============================================================================
TOPIC: ART LOWE, Spammer ------------------------------- Re: Americans are
Dumb Fat Asses Whose Banking System Almost Died Under Bush
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/8aebf6fb3374a24c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 1:52 pm
From: §ρamßuster <�pam�uster@n�yet.ca>


On 1/18/2014 1:35 AM, The Magic Christian wrote:
> Rudy Canoza used his keyboard to write :
>> Ha ha ha ha ha! Front boy actually said that.

========================================================================================

I KNOW I'M A STUPID SPAMMER . . . . AND THIS TOPIC HAS NOTHING
TO DO WITH CANADIAN POLITICS

========================================================================================





== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:36 pm
From: Rudy Canoza


On 1/18/2014 11:45 AM, Jeff M wrote:
> On 1/18/2014 12:44 PM, jim, front boy for a left-wing disinformation collective - that is, a hired liar - lied:
>>
>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>
>>> I know more about everything than you.
>>
>> You are my better in every way.
>
> Indeed.

Yes.

Banks are not public utilities. That's settled.





==============================================================================
TOPIC: Having Butt Sex With Your Boy Is What Democrats Do!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/ef1231fe17476a4c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 2:50 pm
From: "Larry Brinkin"


In article <XnsA2B850B19509CKKK@94.75.214.39>
Eddiie Haskell <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote:
>
> It's what we do man!
>

We know!

Boy adopted by Frank M. Lombard and Kenneth Shipp

5-year-old boy, adopted by Frank M. Lombard and his partner
Kenneth Shipp was allegedly sexually abused by his adoptive
father, Lombard. In a sting operation by Washington DC,
Metropolitan Police Department, Lombard was arrested offering
his adopted son for sexual exploitation over the internet. There
was a 2nd child in the household.

Former Duke employee imprisoned for child porn
Relates to:
Boy adopted by Frank M. Lombard and Kenneth Shipp
Date: 2010-03-30
Source: abclocal.go.com

DURHAM (WTVD) -- A judge sentenced a former Duke University
employee Tuesday for sexual exploitation of a minor.

Frank M. Lombard was sentenced to 27 years and 3 months in
prison on federal charges of producing child pornography.

The 43-year-old former associate director of the Health
Inequalities Program at Duke's Center for Health Policy, pled
guilty on December 17, 2009, to sexual exploitation of a minor.

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler also ordered
Lombard to serve a lifetime of supervised release upon
completion of his prison sentence, during which time he will be
required to register as a sex offender.

According to court documents, Lombard admitted to streaming a
live pornographic image of himself and his 5-year-old adopted
son to another internet user via a webcam in August 2007.

Evidence of the event was found during a search of Lombard's
Durham home in June 2009.

Investigators said in June that they learned of Lombard's
alleged activities through an informant who was also facing sex
charges.

According to an arrest warrant, Lombard made the child sex offer
to a member of the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police working
with the Northern Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against
Children Task Force during an online chat session.

The warrant says Lombard lives in Durham with a gay partner, and
that he has two adopted children.

It says he told the investigator "he could not molest the
adopted 5-year-old child when his partner was around, however
the partner was leaving for a four-day business trip the next
day, which would allow him the ability to molest the child just
as he did the last time his partner had left town."

The warrant goes on to say that Lombard admitted to drugging the
child with Benadryl during the molestation. It also goes into
graphic detail about the molestation - including accusations
Lombard performed oral sex on the child.

In a later chat session, Lombard suggested the person he was
chatting with fly to Raleigh/Durham to have sex with the 5-year-
old.

That same day, Lombard was arrested and child pornography
materials were found in his home.






==============================================================================
TOPIC: Famous presidential lies
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/3cb2a4cd7e7b85f8?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:00 pm
From: Gunner Asch


On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:02:22 -0500, "Jim Wilkins"
<muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <KlausSchadenfreude@gmx.com> wrote in message
>news:an4ld9h9araodt6trigd1a99dc100bnntf@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 09:42:08 -0500, "Jim Wilkins"
>> <muratlanne@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Rudy Canoza" <LaLaLaLaLaLa@philhendrie.con> wrote in message
>>>news:22dcb$52d9d189$414e828e$1272@EVERESTKC.NET...
>>>>
>>>> "Case Closed", by Gerald Posner - the definitive examination of
>>>> the
>>>> assassination and all the goofy conspiracy theories. One gunman,
>>>> acting alone.
>>>>
>>>
>>>The best hard evidence for a second shooter is the Dictabelt
>>>recording:
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictabelt_evidence_relating_to_the_assassination_of_John_F._Kennedy
>>>"Ohio rock drummer Steve Barber listened to that recording
>>>repeatedly
>>>and heard the words "Hold everything secure"
>>
>> Try and read that without laughing. I couldn't.
>>
>
>Do you think that musicians are bad listeners?
>
Id have to say that those who work in noisy environments have
developed filtering into a fine art.


__
"Anyone who thinks Obama is doing a good job
is either stupid or a perpetual societal leech"

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com





== 2 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:41 pm
From: Rudy Canoza


On 1/18/2014 11:52 AM, Winston_Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:56:21 -0800, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 1/16/2014 7:11 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:52:43 -0600, Jeff M wrote:
>>>> On 1/16/2014 11:48 AM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:00:15 -0700, "Ray Keller" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> _____(add you own favorite
>>>>>> here)_____________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> "Trust me." - Every politician ever.
>>>
>>> Well, if we are off just presidents
>>>
>>> Hounds love to be picked up by the ears.
>>> Johnson
>>
>> Not a quote.
>>
>>
>>> Dogs love to travel strapped to the roof of cars.
>>> Romney
>>
>> Not a quote.
>
> The subject of the thread is lies, not quotes.

See below.


>> Even if they were quotes, they aren't necessarily lies. Johnson and
>> Romney might well have believed them to be true, so they wouldn't be
>> lying if they stated their beliefs.
>
> Hee, hee, yeah, OK.

Gotcha - again.





== 3 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:45 pm
From: Winston_Smith


<LaLaLaLaLaLaboy@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>On 1/18/2014 11:52 AM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:56:21 -0800, Rudy Canoza wrote:

>>> Not a quote.
>>
>> The subject of the thread is lies, not quotes.
>
>See below.

Where?
>
>>> Even if they were quotes, they aren't necessarily lies. Johnson and
>>> Romney might well have believed them to be true, so they wouldn't be
>>> lying if they stated their beliefs.
>>
>> Hee, hee, yeah, OK.
>
>Gotcha - again.

Thanks for admiting you are a troll and not interested in serious
discussion.

By the by, HOW did you "get me"? And what's "below"?




== 4 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:46 pm
From: Rudy Canoza


On 1/18/2014 11:53 AM, Winston_Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:57:08 -0800, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 1/17/2014 11:42 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:07:25 -0800, Rudy Canoza
>>> <LaLaLaLaLaLa@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/17/2014 5:38 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 07:52:03 -0800, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/16/2014 10:53 PM, Steve from Colorado wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/16/2014 11:10 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FWIW, I too remember Carter saying it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carter didn't say what you quoted him as saying. He might have said
>>>>>> something to that effect, but he didn't say *EITHER* statement that
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> cited as quotes. You made them up. You've already *admitted* to
>>>>>> having
>>>>>> faked the quote about Cuban troops. You're an admitted forger.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> winnie does *NOT* remember Carter saying what you quoted him as
>>>>>> saying,
>>>>>> because Carter never said that. You and winnie are fuckwits.
>>>>>
>>>>> True to your form. Your only tactic is to deny something was said or
>>>>> happened. That puts you in a lovely spot as no one can ask you to
>>>>> prove a negative (your statement). You get away with maligning a
>>>>> poster, come off like an expert, and can't be challenged.
>>>>
>>>> Carter didn't say what that fuckwit claimed he said. It's that simple -
>>>> the "quote" is fake.
>>>
>>> Yet another denial. That's all you do. Deny. Repeat as necessary.
>>
>> He didn't say what the fuckwit quoted him as saying.
>>
>> You clearly don't understand what a quote is, either.
>
> The subject of the thread is lies, not quotes.

Change of subject noted and scorned.

Your pal the fuckwit, steve, gave a *quote* as an instance of a
presidential lie. And all this time, you've been pissing your little
Depends over the issue of whether or not a president said those words,
and who has the burden of proof. I realize now that you are conceding
you lost on that issue, and so that's why you changed the subject. And
you lost *again*, thanks to your having sided with that fuckwit, steve.

You're not very good at this. You know that, don't you? I think you do.





== 5 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:52 pm
From: Rudy Canoza


On 1/18/2014 12:05 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 1/17/2014 11:47 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>> Rudy Canoza <LaLaLaLaLaLa@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure did.
>>
>> You fuckwit.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> On 1/17/2014 5:41 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:54:06 -0800, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/17/2014 3:37 PM, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/17/2014 3:33 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/17/2014 12:56 PM, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I nominate this as the most egregious lie, the cruelest, the one
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> has damaged the US the most:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. No president said it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Denial
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2. It's not a lie.
>>>>>
>>>>> Denial
>>>>
>>>> Yes, because no president said it. Feel free to show otherwise. You
>>>> can't, and you know you can't. No one can - no president said it.
>>>
>>> Oh, boy. I was waiting for this. I expected it sooner. You set things
>>> up so YOU don't have to support a thing. If you were asked you would
>>> say you can't prove a negative.
>>
>> But one *can* prove a positive...*IF* it is true.
>>
>>
>>> And that's all you do - deny what you don't like.
>>
>> It has nothing to do with "liking" it or not. I know that no president
>> ever publicly said what the fuckwit, Pedro, is claiming.
>>
>>
>>> You can't ever be called. Nice tactic.
>>
>> You idiot. Your buddy, the fuckwit Pedro, made a positive assertion:
>>
>> A president said, 'Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.'
>>
>> The burden of proof is *entirely* on Pedro, the fuckwit. *I* don't have
>> to show that no president said it; *HE* has to demonstrate that some
>> president *DID* say it.
>>
>> I assert that no president said it. All he has to do to prove me wrong
>> is to show, with unambiguous and documented evidence, that at least one
>> president *DID* say it.
>>
>> He can't...because no president said it.
>>
>>
>>>> Because the "US government" [sic] never said such a thing. Feel free to
>>>> show otherwise <chortle>. You know you can't.
>>>
>>> Chortling over your clever little trap, eh?
>>
>> What trap?
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Look, *cunt*:
>>>
>>> Ah yes, the classic liberal in a corner
>>
>> I'm not a liberal; at least, I'm not a liberal in the contemporary
>> illiberal sense of the word. I'm not what you stupidly and wrongly
>> conceive to be a liberal.
>
> More in the numb-nuts troll sort of sense.

I'm not in any sense a contemporary liberal.


>
>> I'm not what you stupidly and wrongly conceive to be a liberal.
>
> How can you possibly know what my conception is?

You reveal it.


>> No. Certitude that you two fuckwits can't support your positive
>> assertions.
>
> I made no positive assertion other than

Liar.


>
>>> Yup. Mom really loves the way you act.
>>
>> Has nothing to do with my deceased mother, you fuckwit.
>
> I'm sorry she is dead.

She was in ill health for a long time. It was her time to go.


>> Come on, bitch - prove your assertion. Give Pedro a helping hand.
>
> 1. Why are you so demeaning of women?

Attempt to change the subject noted and dismissed.


> Who's Pedro?

Your fuckwitted pal - the one who claimed that some president said "Lee
Harvey Oswald acted alone"; the one who put that in quotation marks and
thereby is claiming that some president said those exact words. That's
who Pedro is, you bitch.


> Who's the "bitch"?

You.


> 2. What "assertion"?

Pedro's - the one you're now defending.





== 6 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:54 pm
From: Rudy Canoza


On 1/18/2014 12:05 PM, Jeff M wrote:
> On 1/18/2014 1:53 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:57:08 -0800, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> On 1/17/2014 11:42 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>
>>>> Yet another denial. That's all you do. Deny. Repeat as necessary.
>>>
>>> He didn't say what the fuckwit quoted him as saying.
>>>
>>> You clearly don't understand what a quote is, either.
>>
>> The subject of the thread is lies, not quotes.
>>
>> I can't wait to see what wiggle you come up with next.
>
> I'm amusingly goofy, utterly ignorant, thoroughly disgusting, completely
> insane, or, more likely, some combination thereof

You're all of those, jeffy m - all of those in addition to being a
disgraced *disbarred* ex-lawyer with a civil disability that prevents
you from practicing law.





== 7 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:57 pm
From: Rudy Canoza


On 1/18/2014 3:45 PM, Bitchston_Smith lied:
> On 1/18/2014 3:41 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 1/18/2014 11:52 AM, Bitchston_Smith lied:
>>> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:56:21 -0800, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> On 1/16/2014 7:11 PM, Bitchston_Smith lied:
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:52:43 -0600, Jeff M wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/16/2014 11:48 AM, Bitchston_Smith lied:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:00:15 -0700, "Ray Keller" wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _____(add you own favorite
>>>>>>>> here)_____________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Trust me." - Every politician ever.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, if we are off just presidents
>>>>>
>>>>> Hounds love to be picked up by the ears.
>>>>> Johnson
>>>>
>>>> Not a quote.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Dogs love to travel strapped to the roof of cars.
>>>>> Romney
>>>>
>>>> Not a quote.
>>>
>>> The subject of the thread is lies, not quotes.
>>
>> See below.
>
> Where?

You already saw "where", and commented.


>>
>>>> Even if they were quotes, they aren't necessarily lies. Johnson and
>>>> Romney might well have believed them to be true, so they wouldn't be
>>>> lying if they stated their beliefs.
>>>
>>> Hee, hee, yeah, OK.
>>
>> Gotcha - again.
>
> Thanks for admiting you are a troll and

No. No such admission.

I got you, bitch. I got my hand - I only need one - around your scrawny
scrofulous neck and throttled you.





== 8 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 4:06 pm
From: Jeff M


On 1/18/2014 5:45 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
[snip]
>> Gotcha - again.
>
> Thanks for admiting you are a troll and not interested in serious
> discussion.

Actually, Plimpton is *incapable* of serious discussion, due to his
quite obvious mental health and personality disorders.

> By the by, HOW did you "get me"? And what's "below"?

He got you only through the irrational delusions that Plimpton
substitutes for reasoned and intelligent cognition, and there's nothing
"below" Plimpton; he's as low as anyone can get. It's typical of him to
claim some sort of victory for himself after he's received a thorough
online thrashing. It may seem to some he's just trying to find cover
for his humiliation and punctured ego, but I think he's just too addled
by alcoholic dementia to even be aware of just how badly, and how
entertainingly, he keeps losing these little tiffs over his nonsensical
spew.




--
�The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in
moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification
for selfishness.� - John Kenneth Galbraith




== 9 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 4:09 pm
From: Winston_Smith


On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:57:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza
<LaLaLaLaLaLa@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>On 1/18/2014 3:45 PM, Bitchston_Smith lied:
>> On 1/18/2014 3:41 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

>>> See below.
>>
>> Where?
>
>You already saw "where", and commented.

Point it out instead of pretending it's real.

>>>>> Even if they were quotes, they aren't necessarily lies. Johnson and
>>>>> Romney might well have believed them to be true, so they wouldn't be
>>>>> lying if they stated their beliefs.
>>>>
>>>> Hee, hee, yeah, OK.
>>>
>>> Gotcha - again.
>>
>> Thanks for admiting you are a troll and
>
>No. No such admission.
>
>I got you, bitch.

Why do you denigrate women so much? Do you hate your mother? Were you
dumped? Are your gay? Perhaps you had a gender change and the
operation went badly.

And just how did you "get me"? Seems you keep ducking that question.

>I got my hand - I only need one - around your scrawny
>scrofulous neck and throttled you.

If you say so but to the rational folks here, it seems it's only in
your (alleged) mind since you refuse to point out how.




== 10 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 4:11 pm
From: Rudy Canoza


On 1/18/2014 4:06 PM, Jeff M wrote:
> On 1/18/2014 5:45 PM, Winston_Smith wrote:
> [snip]
>>> Gotcha - again.
>>
>> Thanks for admiting you are a troll and not interested in serious
>> discussion.
>
> Actually, Canoza *kills* leftists and other morons in serious discussion, due to his

Perspicacity.





== 11 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 4:12 pm
From: Rudy Canoza


On 1/18/2014 4:09 PM, Bitchston_Smith lied:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:57:47 -0800, Rudy Canoza
> <LaLaLaLaLaLa@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>> On 1/18/2014 3:45 PM, Bitchston_Smith lied:
>>> On 1/18/2014 3:41 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> On 1/18/2014 11:52 AM, Bitchston_Smith lied:
>>>>> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:56:21 -0800, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/16/2014 7:11 PM, Bitchston_Smith lied:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:52:43 -0600, Jeff M wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/16/2014 11:48 AM, Bitchston_Smith lied:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:00:15 -0700, "Ray Keller" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _____(add you own favorite
>>>>>>>>>> here)_____________________________________________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Trust me." - Every politician ever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, if we are off just presidents
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hounds love to be picked up by the ears.
>>>>>>> Johnson
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not a quote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dogs love to travel strapped to the roof of cars.
>>>>>>> Romney
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not a quote.
>>>>>
>>>>> The subject of the thread is lies, not quotes.
>>>>
>>>> See below.
>>>
>>> Where?
>>
>> You already saw "where", and commented.
>
> Point it out

I did.


>>>>>> Even if they were quotes, they aren't necessarily lies. Johnson and
>>>>>> Romney might well have believed them to be true, so they wouldn't be
>>>>>> lying if they stated their beliefs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hee, hee, yeah, OK.
>>>>
>>>> Gotcha - again.
>>>
>>> Thanks for admiting you are a troll and
>>
>> No. No such admission.
>>
>> I got you, bitch.
>
> Why do you denigrate women

Invalid complex question - dismissed.

Why do you beat your wife?


> And just how did you "get me"?

See below.



>> I got my hand - I only need one - around your scrawny
>> scrofulous neck and throttled you.
>
> If you say so but

It's so.





== 12 of 12 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 4:13 pm
From: Ramon F Herrera


On 1/17/2014 11:14 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On 1/17/2014 5:54 PM, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>> On 1/17/2014 6:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> "Case Closed", by Gerald Posner - the definitive examination of the
>>> assassination and all the goofy conspiracy theories. One gunman, acting
>>> alone.
>>>
>>
>> How nice.
>
> It is the definitive statement on it.
>
> One gunman, acting alone.
>

We can easily tell that you are from the Evolution Denial side, and the
anti-education crowd.

The better the school, the more Liberal.

-Ramon







==============================================================================
TOPIC: Ping Richard!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/1b38c3b536a8c4aa?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:26 pm
From: Gunner Asch


On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:17:04 -0600, Richard <cavelamb@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>Forgive me if I don't get too excited about a cheap boat
>1200 miles away.
>

What..its a Capri 22, its in your price range and is it actually 1200
miles away? Is that how far Florida is from your place in Texas?

In land or water miles?

Or are you now claiming that Capris are "cheap boats" despite asking
me to find you one "within range"?

As Ive stated..they made 1500 of them give or take ..and they arent as
easy to find as zits on the neighbor kids face. LEAST of all if you
live "Deep in the heart of Texas"

So be it. You lost the one in Galvastin because of your temper
tantrums..I wont bother looking for them for you. So far Ive found
you (4) of them and each and every time you turned up your nose
because of some horseshit reason.

Looks like you are all talk and no walk.

Or you are hoping the Used Sailboat Fairy will deliver one to your
curb with a big pink bow on it.

Sorry Rich...nice fantasy..but..not so much "real world"

http://forums.sailinganarchy.com/index.php?showtopic=88791

"Go for it. After 4 or 5 sails, it'll make a nice lawn ornament.

The rating is simply indicative of the lack of speed the Capri 22
shows. the design did not transfer well form the 25-a much faster,
better boat! You will get crushed by Tuna 20s, J-24s and Ranger 26s.
About the only boat you will beat is:

Attached File sailing_chair.jpg 15.19K 9 downloads
or
Attached File Hot_yacht.jpg 20.98K 17 downloads
or
Attached File Shitbox_3.jpg 107.41K 32 downloads

Look for a Capri 25. OH!! There's a Fun 23 (Ranger) in SA
Classifieds...a much better choice, better sailing and it's faster.
Lowball them, the boat market is softer than Chaney's pecker. "



Gunner, who posted a bunch more this morning

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/freesailboats/conversations/messages


__
"Anyone who thinks Obama is doing a good job
is either stupid or a perpetual societal leech"

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com





== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:53 pm
From: Richard


On 1/18/2014 5:26 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:17:04 -0600, Richard<cavelamb@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Forgive me if I don't get too excited about a cheap boat
>> 1200 miles away.
>>
>
> What..its a Capri 22, its in your price range and is it actually 1200
> miles away? Is that how far Florida is from your place in Texas?

No, it's in YOUR price range.
Yes, it's that far from Dallas to Sarasota.

>
> In land or water miles?

Statuate
>
> Or are you now claiming that Capris are "cheap boats" despite asking
> me to find you one "within range"?
>
> As Ive stated..they made 1500 of them give or take ..and they arent as
> easy to find as zits on the neighbor kids face. LEAST of all if you
> live "Deep in the heart of Texas"
>
> So be it. You lost the one in Galvastin because of your temper
> tantrums..I wont bother looking for them for you. So far Ive found
> you (4) of them and each and every time you turned up your nose
> because of some horseshit reason.
>
> Looks like you are all talk and no walk.
>
> Or you are hoping the Used Sailboat Fairy will deliver one to your
> curb with a big pink bow on it.
>
> Sorry Rich...nice fantasy..but..not so much "real world"
>
> http://forums.sailinganarchy.com/index.php?showtopic=88791
>
> "Go for it. After 4 or 5 sails, it'll make a nice lawn ornament.
>
> The rating is simply indicative of the lack of speed the Capri 22
> shows. the design did not transfer well form the 25-a much faster,
> better boat! You will get crushed by Tuna 20s, J-24s and Ranger 26s.
> About the only boat you will beat is:
>
> Attached File sailing_chair.jpg 15.19K 9 downloads
> or
> Attached File Hot_yacht.jpg 20.98K 17 downloads
> or
> Attached File Shitbox_3.jpg 107.41K 32 downloads
>
> Look for a Capri 25. OH!! There's a Fun 23 (Ranger) in SA
> Classifieds...a much better choice, better sailing and it's faster.
> Lowball them, the boat market is softer than Chaney's pecker. "
>
>
>
> Gunner, who posted a bunch more this morning
>
> https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/freesailboats/conversations/messages
>
>
> __
> "Anyone who thinks Obama is doing a good job
> is either stupid or a perpetual societal leech"
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>





== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:54 pm
From: Richard



>
> So be it. You lost the one in Galvastin because of your temper
> tantrums..I wont bother looking for them for you. So far Ive found
> you (4) of them and each and every time you turned up your nose
> because of some horseshit reason.
>

Thank you.





==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Fact Is, The Rich Don't Have Enough Money
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/t/1b1dc40682737d00?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:34 pm
From: Rudy Canoza


On 1/18/2014 10:56 AM, Filthy McNasty wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:39:14 -0800, Rudy Canoza <LaLaLaLaLaLa@philhendrie.con>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/2014 9:03 AM, Filthy McNasty wrote:
>>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:19:11 -0800, Rudy Canoza <LaLaLaLaLaLa@philhendrie.con>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/17/2014 9:01 AM, a425couple wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Grayling High School" <tracey12_12_12@yahoo.com> wrote in message...
>>>>>> Re: The Fact Is, The Rich Don't Have Enough Money They never have.
>>>>>> That's why we need to pay the taxes while they pay nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are silly and WRONG. The "rich" pay the majority of income taxes
>>>>> paid, as it is.
>>>>>
>>>>> "The top 5 percent earned 33.78 percent of income and paid 59.07 percent
>>>>> of taxes,
>>>>> and the top 10 percent earned 45.17 percent of income and paid 70.62
>>>>> percent of taxes."
>>>>>
>>>>> http://taxfoundation.org/article/what-do-americans-really-pay-income-taxes
>>>
>> Exactly right.
>
> I suck dog dicks too. Chihuahuas, are my favorite.

Keep that out of here, rectum-sweat. No one cares what kind of dicks
you like to suck.





== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 18 2014 3:40 pm
From: Rudy Canoza


On 1/18/2014 1:18 PM, Baxter wrote:
> Al Czervik <Caddyshack.Al@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:lbejhg$h3h$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 1/18/2014 7:38 AM, Baxter wrote:
>>> "2,304 murdered in Obama's organized communities"
>>> :
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:14:33 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>> <lbax_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yet some how that top 5% owns 2/3 of all the stock while the bottom
>>>>> 50% own ~ 0.5%
>>>>>
>>>>> Some how the top 5% owns nearly 80% of the wealth while the bottom
>>>>> 80% owns just 7% (which includes their homes.)
>>>>
>>>> Because, while you were being a jealous li'l petulant prick,
>>>
>>> You rightards can never make up your minds - first you want people to
>>> be jealous of the rich so they will work harder, then you castigate
>>> them for it.
>>>
>>>
>>>> they were
>>>> earning it.
>>>
>>> Show where Paris Hilton earned even a portion of her wealth.
>>
>> You are so pissed off jealous.
>>
> IOW,

In other words, because she didn't hold a gun to anyone's head to
acquire her wealth, it is presumed she earned it ethically.

Show that she didn't. Come on, Bugster - show how she earned it
unethically.

Here's a hint for you: if Bill Gates were to approach me and say,
"You're a great guy who has worked hard and always done the right thing.
I'm going to give you $500 million, net of gift taxes. Here's your
check", then I earned that money honestly and ethically. No question
about it. And of course, Gates earned his honestly and ethically, too -
not in dispute - so there is no ethical issue of me obtaining "tainted"
money.

Fact: large concentrations of wealth are not unethical /per se/.
That's just a fact. You must accommodate yourself to that fact.





==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.crafts.metalworking"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.crafts.metalworking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en